2014•International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social SciencesOpen access

The Impact of Teacher’s Implicit versus Explicit Corrective Feedback on Learning L2 grammar by Iranian English learners

Maryam Karimi

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the impact of oral corrective feedback on acquiring simple past tense and quantifiers by Persian EFL learners in spring 2012. In an experimental design (two experimental groups and a control group), 90 low-intermediate learners of second language English performed communicative tasks (spot different test) during which they received either recasts (implicit feedback) or metalinguistic explanation (explicit feedback) in response to any utterance that contained an error in the target structure. Acquisition was measured by means of a multiple choice test .The test was administered prior to the instruction, 1 day after the instruction, and again 2 weeks late. Statistical comparisons of the learners’ performance on the immediate and delayed posttest showed a clear advantage for explicit feedback over implicit feedback.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study aimed to investigate the impact of oral corrective feedback on acquiring simple past tense and quantifiers by Persian EFL learners in spring 2012. In an experimental design (two experimental groups and a control group), 90 low-intermediate learners of second language English performed communicative tasks (spot different test) during which they received either recasts (implicit feedback) or metalinguistic explanation (explicit feedback) in response to any utterance that contained an error in the target structure. Acquisition was measured by means of a multiple choice test .The test was administered prior to the instruction, 1 day after the instruction, and again 2 weeks late. Statistical comparisons of the learners’ performance on the immediate and delayed posttest showed a clear advantage for explicit feedback over implicit feedback.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study aimed to investigate the impact of oral corrective feedback on acquiring simple past tense and quantifiers by Persian EFL learners in spring 2012. In an experimental design (two experimental groups and a control group), 90 low-intermediate learners of second language English performed communicative tasks (spot different test) during which they received either recasts (implicit feedback) or metalinguistic explanation (explicit feedback) in response to any utterance that contained an error in the target structure. Acquisition was measured by means of a multiple choice test .The test was administered prior to the instruction, 1 day after the instruction, and again 2 weeks late. Statistical comparisons of the learners’ performance on the immediate and delayed posttest showed a clear advantage for explicit feedback over implicit feedback.

Key concepts: Corrective feedback, Grammar, Utterance, Simple past, Test (biology), Second-language acquisition, Computer science, Focus on form

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Impact of Teacher’s Implicit versus Explicit Corrective Feedback on Learning L2 grammar by Iranian English learners — Research Paper | ScholarLens