2013Information & Communications Technology LawRequires access

Originality requirement and copyright regime of music: a comparative overview of Indian perspective

Nehaluddin Ahmad, Saurabh Chaturvedi

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

The quest of originality and not of imitation has always been the most important element in musical composition. In law, originality has become an important legal doctrine where creativity and innovation have been protected as copyrightable works. Some countries grant copyright protection based on how much labour and diligence it took to create a work, rather than how original a work is. This is referred to as the ‘sweat of the brow’ doctrine. This doctrine has been recognized at various time in many countries such as USA, UK, Canada, Australia, and elsewhere. In India, the copyright statute has been in existence since long and moreover India is a member of various international intellectual property treaties and conventions, but the situation continues to be pathetic. The lack of protection allows high-profile music directors and domestic musicians in India to get away with copyright infringement. In what sense does a literary work need to be ‘original’ protected by copyright in India? Is the law of originality in a satisfactory state? How, if at all, might it be improved? This paper will examine the Indian position on the concept of ‘originality’ in the law of copyright, determine whether this law is satisfactory and make suggestions for improvement if necessary.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The quest of originality and not of imitation has always been the most important element in musical composition. In law, originality has become an important legal doctrine where creativity and innovation have been protected as copyrightable works. Some countries grant copyright protection based on how much labour and diligence it took to create a work, rather than how original a work is. This is referred to as the ‘sweat of the brow’ doctrine. This doctrine has been recognized at various time in many countries such as USA, UK, Canada, Australia, and elsewhere. In India, the copyright statute has been in existence since long and moreover India is a member of various international intellectual property treaties and conventions, but the situation continues to be pathetic. The lack of protection allows high-profile music directors and domestic musicians in India to get away with copyright infringement. In what sense does a literary work need to be ‘original’ protected by copyright in India? Is the law of originality in a satisfactory state? How, if at all, might it be improved? This paper will examine the Indian position on the concept of ‘originality’ in the law of copyright, determine whether this law is satisfactory and make suggestions for improvement if necessary.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The quest of originality and not of imitation has always been the most important element in musical composition. In law, originality has become an important legal doctrine where creativity and innovation have been protected as copyrightable works. Some countries grant copyright protection based on how much labour and diligence it took to create a work, rather than how original a work is. This is referred to as the ‘sweat of the brow’ doctrine. This doctrine has been recognized at various time in many countries such as USA, UK, Canada, Australia, and elsewhere. In India, the copyright statute has been in existence since long and moreover India is a member of various international intellectual property treaties and conventions, but the situation continues to be pathetic. The lack of protection allows high-profile music directors and domestic musicians in India to get away with copyright infringement. In what sense does a literary work need to be ‘original’ protected by copyright in India? Is the law of originality in a satisfactory state? How, if at all, might it be improved? This paper will examine the Indian position on the concept of ‘originality’ in the law of copyright, determine whether this law is satisfactory and make suggestions for improvement if necessary.

Key concepts: Originality, Doctrine, Intellectual property, Copyright law, Law, Statute, International law, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Originality requirement and copyright regime of music: a comparative overview of Indian perspective — Research Paper | ScholarLens