Logos Ethos and Pathos in Political Discourse
Tamar Mshvenieradze
Abstract
Open-access reader
Tamar Mshvenieradze
Abstract
Open-access reader
Given article aims at underlining all linguistic means out of the discourses of 2002 and 2007 presidential candidates Jacques Chirac and Nicolas Sarkozy that served as the Triad of Aristotle argumentation -Logos, Ethos, and Pathos -without which it is impossible to build any type of argumentative written, verbal, and/or as in our case, political discourses.
OpenAlex reports 36 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Given article aims at underlining all linguistic means out of the discourses of 2002 and 2007 presidential candidates Jacques Chirac and Nicolas Sarkozy that served as the Triad of Aristotle argumentation -Logos, Ethos, and Pathos -without which it is impossible to build any type of argumentative written, verbal, and/or as in our case, political discourses.
Key concepts: Pathos, Ethos, Logos Bible Software, Politics, Aesthetics, Sociology, Epistemology, Linguistics