1993•The Journal of Infectious DiseasesRequires access

Diagnosis of Congenital Syphilis by Combining Treponema pallidum-Specific IgM Detection with Immunofluorescent Antigen Detection for T. pallidum

Kenneth Bromberg, Sarah A. Rawstron, Gaylene Tannis

Open publisher page 46 citations

Abstract

Most infants at risk for congenital syphilis can be identified easily by a positive maternal serologic test for syphilis. However, a diagnosis of congenital syphilis can be difficult to make in an individual infant. Seven infants with delayed-onset congenital syphilis and 101 newborns at risk for congenital syphilis were evaluated for characteristic physical findings and laboratory-detectable abnormalities of congenital syphilis. By using a combination of Western blot for T. pallidum-specific IgM detection and immunofluorescent antigen detection for the identification of T. pallidum, a diagnosis of congenital syphilis was made in all 7 infants with delayed-onset congenital syphilis and 24 of the 101 newborns at risk for congenital syphilis. However, T. pallidum-specific IgM was negative in 6 of the 24 newborns with congenital syphilis. T. pallidum-specific IgM detection alone is inadequate for the diagnosis of congenital syphilis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Most infants at risk for congenital syphilis can be identified easily by a positive maternal serologic test for syphilis. However, a diagnosis of congenital syphilis can be difficult to make in an individual infant. Seven infants with delayed-onset congenital syphilis and 101 newborns at risk for congenital syphilis were evaluated for characteristic physical findings and laboratory-detectable abnormalities of congenital syphilis. By using a combination of Western blot for T. pallidum-specific IgM detection and immunofluorescent antigen detection for the identification of T. pallidum, a diagnosis of congenital syphilis was made in all 7 infants with delayed-onset congenital syphilis and 24 of the 101 newborns at risk for congenital syphilis. However, T. pallidum-specific IgM was negative in 6 of the 24 newborns with congenital syphilis. T. pallidum-specific IgM detection alone is inadequate for the diagnosis of congenital syphilis.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 46 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Most infants at risk for congenital syphilis can be identified easily by a positive maternal serologic test for syphilis. However, a diagnosis of congenital syphilis can be difficult to make in an individual infant. Seven infants with delayed-onset congenital syphilis and 101 newborns at risk for congenital syphilis were evaluated for characteristic physical findings and laboratory-detectable abnormalities of congenital syphilis. By using a combination of Western blot for T. pallidum-specific IgM detection and immunofluorescent antigen detection for the identification of T. pallidum, a diagnosis of congenital syphilis was made in all 7 infants with delayed-onset congenital syphilis and 24 of the 101 newborns at risk for congenital syphilis. However, T. pallidum-specific IgM was negative in 6 of the 24 newborns with congenital syphilis. T. pallidum-specific IgM detection alone is inadequate for the diagnosis of congenital syphilis.

Key concepts: Congenital syphilis, Syphilis, Treponema, Medicine, Serology, Syphilis Serodiagnosis, Treponematosis, Immunology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Diagnosis of Congenital Syphilis by Combining Treponema pallidum-Specific IgM Detection with Immunofluorescent Antigen Detection for T. pallidum — Research Paper | ScholarLens