1998Higher Education QuarterlyRequires access

Undergraduate Non‐Completion: Developing an Explanatory Model

Jenny Ozga, Laura Sukhnandan

Open publisher page 288 citations

Abstract

This paper presents an explanatory model of undergraduate non‐completion based, primarily, on the findings of a qualitative case study. Previous research in the field of non‐completion is briefly reviewed. Such work is somewhat limited in its explanatory usefulness because it tends to focus on the student as the problem. The causes of non‐completion can only be fully understood as the culmination of a complex social process of student‐institution interaction which operates within the context of change in higher education. From this sociologically‐informed theoretical framework an explanatory model has been devised that shows how the process of withdrawal for conventional students (i.e. students who enter HE through the traditional academic route) is markedly different from that for mature students. For conventional students the factors which appear to be of central importance are student preparedness, compatibility of choice, and time of exit. In contrast, mature students are often forced into non‐completion because of external circumstances. Following a detailed description of our explanatory model of undergraduate non‐completion, we present a number of strategies for intervention at both national and institutional levels and outline the implications for higher education policy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper presents an explanatory model of undergraduate non‐completion based, primarily, on the findings of a qualitative case study. Previous research in the field of non‐completion is briefly reviewed. Such work is somewhat limited in its explanatory usefulness because it tends to focus on the student as the problem. The causes of non‐completion can only be fully understood as the culmination of a complex social process of student‐institution interaction which operates within the context of change in higher education. From this sociologically‐informed theoretical framework an explanatory model has been devised that shows how the process of withdrawal for conventional students (i.e. students who enter HE through the traditional academic route) is markedly different from that for mature students. For conventional students the factors which appear to be of central importance are student preparedness, compatibility of choice, and time of exit. In contrast, mature students are often forced into non‐completion because of external circumstances. Following a detailed description of our explanatory model of undergraduate non‐completion, we present a number of strategies for intervention at both national and institutional levels and outline the implications for higher education policy.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 288 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper presents an explanatory model of undergraduate non‐completion based, primarily, on the findings of a qualitative case study. Previous research in the field of non‐completion is briefly reviewed. Such work is somewhat limited in its explanatory usefulness because it tends to focus on the student as the problem. The causes of non‐completion can only be fully understood as the culmination of a complex social process of student‐institution interaction which operates within the context of change in higher education. From this sociologically‐informed theoretical framework an explanatory model has been devised that shows how the process of withdrawal for conventional students (i.e. students who enter HE through the traditional academic route) is markedly different from that for mature students. For conventional students the factors which appear to be of central importance are student preparedness, compatibility of choice, and time of exit. In contrast, mature students are often forced into non‐completion because of external circumstances. Following a detailed description of our explanatory model of undergraduate non‐completion, we present a number of strategies for intervention at both national and institutional levels and outline the implications for higher education policy.

Key concepts: Explanatory model, Preparedness, Psychology, Higher education, Context (archaeology), Qualitative research, Mathematics education, Medical education

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Undergraduate Non‐Completion: Developing an Explanatory Model — Research Paper | ScholarLens