Is it possible to improve the prognosis in nickel contact dermatitis?
K. Kalimo, Kaija Lammintausta, J. Jalava, Tuulikki Niskanen
Abstract
K. Kalimo, Kaija Lammintausta, J. Jalava, Tuulikki Niskanen
Abstract
A questionnaire was sent to 143 patients who had shown a positive patch test reaction to nickel sulfate more than 10 years earlier. 91 patients returned the questionnaire, revealing that after the testing, 73 had suffered from dermatitis, 61 especially from hand dermatitis. 37 of these patients were clinically examined and patch tested with standard series and in addition, 12 patients were tested with nickel sulfate and nickel chloride with different occlusion times. At the clinic visit, 23 patients had dermatitis, 16 hand dermatitis, and 11 were symptom-free. 26 of the patients had metal items close to their skin and 21 of them had current dermatitis, 14 hand dermatitis. Of the 11 patients who had no metal exposure, 9 were symptom-free. The association of dermatitis with exposure to metal objects was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Those patients who had current dermatitis had also developed multiple allergies and reacted to nickel with shorter application times in patch tests, as compared to those who were symptom-free. It seemed possible that the prognosis for nickel dermatitis could be improved if nickel-allergic patients would strictly avoid metal contact, especially in clothing and jewelry.
OpenAlex reports 47 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A questionnaire was sent to 143 patients who had shown a positive patch test reaction to nickel sulfate more than 10 years earlier. 91 patients returned the questionnaire, revealing that after the testing, 73 had suffered from dermatitis, 61 especially from hand dermatitis. 37 of these patients were clinically examined and patch tested with standard series and in addition, 12 patients were tested with nickel sulfate and nickel chloride with different occlusion times. At the clinic visit, 23 patients had dermatitis, 16 hand dermatitis, and 11 were symptom-free. 26 of the patients had metal items close to their skin and 21 of them had current dermatitis, 14 hand dermatitis. Of the 11 patients who had no metal exposure, 9 were symptom-free. The association of dermatitis with exposure to metal objects was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Those patients who had current dermatitis had also developed multiple allergies and reacted to nickel with shorter application times in patch tests, as compared to those who were symptom-free. It seemed possible that the prognosis for nickel dermatitis could be improved if nickel-allergic patients would strictly avoid metal contact, especially in clothing and jewelry.
Key concepts: Hand dermatitis, Contact dermatitis, Medicine, Nickel allergy, Dermatology, Patch test, Allergic contact dermatitis, Allergy