1987Journal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresRequires access

Paleomagnetism of Cretaceous Pacific Seamounts revisited

John A. Hildebrand, Robert L. Parker

Open publisher page 44 citations

Abstract

The paleomagnetism of Cretaceous Pacific seamounts is reexamined. Herein techniques for nonuniform magnetic modeling are applied to determine paleomagnetic pole positions and their associated confidence limits. Modeling techniques are presented for reconstruction of both uniform and nonuniform components of the seamount magnetization. The uniform component yields an estimate of the paleomagnetic pole position, and the nonuniform component accounts for irregularities in the seamount magnetization. A seminorm minimization approach constructs maximally uniform magnetizations and is used to represent seamount interiors. A statistical modeling approach constructs random nonuniform magnetizations and is used to determine the confidence limits associated with each pole position. Mean paleopoles are calculated for groups of seamounts, including their associated error bounds. The mean paleopole for seven reliably dated Upper Cretaceous seamounts is located close to the position predicted by Pacific‐hotspot relative motion. The paleopole for five seamounts with Cretaceous minimum dates is located west of the hotspotpredicted apparent polar wander path and may represent a Lower Cretaceous or Upper Jurassic pole.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The paleomagnetism of Cretaceous Pacific seamounts is reexamined. Herein techniques for nonuniform magnetic modeling are applied to determine paleomagnetic pole positions and their associated confidence limits. Modeling techniques are presented for reconstruction of both uniform and nonuniform components of the seamount magnetization. The uniform component yields an estimate of the paleomagnetic pole position, and the nonuniform component accounts for irregularities in the seamount magnetization. A seminorm minimization approach constructs maximally uniform magnetizations and is used to represent seamount interiors. A statistical modeling approach constructs random nonuniform magnetizations and is used to determine the confidence limits associated with each pole position. Mean paleopoles are calculated for groups of seamounts, including their associated error bounds. The mean paleopole for seven reliably dated Upper Cretaceous seamounts is located close to the position predicted by Pacific‐hotspot relative motion. The paleopole for five seamounts with Cretaceous minimum dates is located west of the hotspotpredicted apparent polar wander path and may represent a Lower Cretaceous or Upper Jurassic pole.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 44 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The paleomagnetism of Cretaceous Pacific seamounts is reexamined. Herein techniques for nonuniform magnetic modeling are applied to determine paleomagnetic pole positions and their associated confidence limits. Modeling techniques are presented for reconstruction of both uniform and nonuniform components of the seamount magnetization. The uniform component yields an estimate of the paleomagnetic pole position, and the nonuniform component accounts for irregularities in the seamount magnetization. A seminorm minimization approach constructs maximally uniform magnetizations and is used to represent seamount interiors. A statistical modeling approach constructs random nonuniform magnetizations and is used to determine the confidence limits associated with each pole position. Mean paleopoles are calculated for groups of seamounts, including their associated error bounds. The mean paleopole for seven reliably dated Upper Cretaceous seamounts is located close to the position predicted by Pacific‐hotspot relative motion. The paleopole for five seamounts with Cretaceous minimum dates is located west of the hotspotpredicted apparent polar wander path and may represent a Lower Cretaceous or Upper Jurassic pole.

Key concepts: Seamount, Paleomagnetism, Geology, Cretaceous, Apparent polar wander, Paleontology, Hotspot (geology), Geodesy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Paleomagnetism of Cretaceous Pacific Seamounts revisited — Research Paper | ScholarLens