Paleomagnetism of the Joban Seamount Chain: Its origin and tectonic implications for the Pacific plate
Desiderius C. P. Masalu, Kensaku Tamaki, William W. Sager
Abstract
Desiderius C. P. Masalu, Kensaku Tamaki, William W. Sager
Abstract
The paleomagnetism of 10 seamounts from the Joban Seamount Chain (northwestern Pacific) were studied using a method that calculates mean magnetization parameters by an inversion of magnetic anomaly and edifice bathymetry. Of the 10 seamounts, eight gave results consistent with other paleomagnetic studies of Pacific seamounts. Joban seamounts appear to have formed at two different mean paleolatitudes, contrary to what would be expected for a single hotspot origin. Furthermore, six of the consistent poles plot along the 129 to 82 Ma portion of the Pacific plate apparent polar wander path (APWP), implying the seamounts formed mainly during the mid‐ to Late Cretaceous. Two other poles, from Iwaki and Hitachi seamounts, are located northwest of the older end of the established Pacific APWP, possibly indicating Early Cretaceous ages. Because Iwaki and Hitachi seamounts are located in the middle of the chain, age does not progress along the chain, arguing against a single‐hotspot origin. Perhaps the chain formed by recurrent volcanism along a line of weakness or by another mechanism. Iwaki and Hitachi seamounts display smaller northward drift compared to the others, consistent with the Pacific plate drifting southward from Late Jurassic or Early Cretaceous to mid‐Cretaceous time.
OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The paleomagnetism of 10 seamounts from the Joban Seamount Chain (northwestern Pacific) were studied using a method that calculates mean magnetization parameters by an inversion of magnetic anomaly and edifice bathymetry. Of the 10 seamounts, eight gave results consistent with other paleomagnetic studies of Pacific seamounts. Joban seamounts appear to have formed at two different mean paleolatitudes, contrary to what would be expected for a single hotspot origin. Furthermore, six of the consistent poles plot along the 129 to 82 Ma portion of the Pacific plate apparent polar wander path (APWP), implying the seamounts formed mainly during the mid‐ to Late Cretaceous. Two other poles, from Iwaki and Hitachi seamounts, are located northwest of the older end of the established Pacific APWP, possibly indicating Early Cretaceous ages. Because Iwaki and Hitachi seamounts are located in the middle of the chain, age does not progress along the chain, arguing against a single‐hotspot origin. Perhaps the chain formed by recurrent volcanism along a line of weakness or by another mechanism. Iwaki and Hitachi seamounts display smaller northward drift compared to the others, consistent with the Pacific plate drifting southward from Late Jurassic or Early Cretaceous to mid‐Cretaceous time.
Key concepts: Seamount, Geology, Paleomagnetism, Apparent polar wander, Pacific Plate, Cretaceous, Hotspot (geology), Paleontology