1999British Journal of PharmacologyOpen access

Levcromakalim causes indirect endothelial hyperpolarization via a myo‐endothelial pathway

Takeshi Murai, Katsuhiko Muraki, Yuji Imaizumi, Minoru Watanabe

Open full text 28 citations

Abstract

1. Effects of K+ channel opener, levcromakalim, on vascular endothelial cells were examined. Under voltage- and current-clamp conditions, application of acetylcholine to dispersed endothelial cells isolated from rabbit superior mesenteric artery (dispersed RMAECs) produced hyperpolarization and outward currents. On the other hand, dispersed RMAECs did not respond to levcromakalim. 2. When membrane potential was recorded from endothelium in a mesenteric arterial segment, exposure to levcromakalim in a concentration range of 0.1 to 3 microM caused concentration-dependent hyperpolarization. The hyperpolarization was observed in the absence of external Ca2+ and was inhibited by 10 microM glibenclamide. 3. The presence of 1 mM heptanol did not affect the levcromakalin-induced hyperpolarization, whereas treatment of the mesenteric arterial segment with 20 microM 18 beta-glycyrrhetinic acid significantly reduced the hyperpolarization. The response to acetylcholine of RMAECs in an arterial segment with 18 beta-glycyrrhetinic acid was, however, similar to that without 18 beta-glycyrrhetinic acid. 4. These suggest that although RMAECs themselves are functionally insensitive to levcromakalim, those in an arterial segment are hyperpolarized by levcromakalim via myo-endothelial electrical communication.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

1. Effects of K+ channel opener, levcromakalim, on vascular endothelial cells were examined. Under voltage- and current-clamp conditions, application of acetylcholine to dispersed endothelial cells isolated from rabbit superior mesenteric artery (dispersed RMAECs) produced hyperpolarization and outward currents. On the other hand, dispersed RMAECs did not respond to levcromakalim. 2. When membrane potential was recorded from endothelium in a mesenteric arterial segment, exposure to levcromakalim in a concentration range of 0.1 to 3 microM caused concentration-dependent hyperpolarization. The hyperpolarization was observed in the absence of external Ca2+ and was inhibited by 10 microM glibenclamide. 3. The presence of 1 mM heptanol did not affect the levcromakalin-induced hyperpolarization, whereas treatment of the mesenteric arterial segment with 20 microM 18 beta-glycyrrhetinic acid significantly reduced the hyperpolarization. The response to acetylcholine of RMAECs in an arterial segment with 18 beta-glycyrrhetinic acid was, however, similar to that without 18 beta-glycyrrhetinic acid. 4. These suggest that although RMAECs themselves are functionally insensitive to levcromakalim, those in an arterial segment are hyperpolarized by levcromakalim via myo-endothelial electrical communication.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 28 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

1. Effects of K+ channel opener, levcromakalim, on vascular endothelial cells were examined. Under voltage- and current-clamp conditions, application of acetylcholine to dispersed endothelial cells isolated from rabbit superior mesenteric artery (dispersed RMAECs) produced hyperpolarization and outward currents. On the other hand, dispersed RMAECs did not respond to levcromakalim. 2. When membrane potential was recorded from endothelium in a mesenteric arterial segment, exposure to levcromakalim in a concentration range of 0.1 to 3 microM caused concentration-dependent hyperpolarization. The hyperpolarization was observed in the absence of external Ca2+ and was inhibited by 10 microM glibenclamide. 3. The presence of 1 mM heptanol did not affect the levcromakalin-induced hyperpolarization, whereas treatment of the mesenteric arterial segment with 20 microM 18 beta-glycyrrhetinic acid significantly reduced the hyperpolarization. The response to acetylcholine of RMAECs in an arterial segment with 18 beta-glycyrrhetinic acid was, however, similar to that without 18 beta-glycyrrhetinic acid. 4. These suggest that although RMAECs themselves are functionally insensitive to levcromakalim, those in an arterial segment are hyperpolarized by levcromakalim via myo-endothelial electrical communication.

Key concepts: Hyperpolarization (physics), Mesenteric arteries, Membrane potential, Chemistry, Glibenclamide, Acetylcholine, Endothelium, Biophysics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Levcromakalim causes indirect endothelial hyperpolarization via a myo‐endothelial pathway — Research Paper | ScholarLens