1992British Journal of PharmacologyOpen access

Evidence that nitric oxide does not mediate the hyperpolarization and relaxation to acetylcholine in the rat small mesenteric artery

C J Garland, Grant A. McPherson

Open full text 358 citations

Abstract

1 Acetylcholine caused a concentration-dependent smooth muscle hyperpolarization and relaxation in rat small mesenteric arteries (diameter at 100 mmHg 250-450 mm) stimulated with noradrenaline (3 microM). 2 Nitric oxide (NO), generated from either NO-gas or from acidified sodium nitrite, also induced smooth muscle hyperpolarization but only in the absence of active force. However, unlike the hyperpolarizations to acetylcholine, those to NO were abolished either by prior smooth muscle depolarization caused by noradrenaline, or by the K+ channel blocker, glibenclamide (3 microM). 3 Hyperpolarization and relaxation to acetylcholine were unaffected by prior exposure of the mesenteric artery to either the cyclo-oxygenase inhibitor, indomethacin (10 microM), or the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, NG-nitro-L-arginine (L-NNA, 100 microM). 4 Haemoglobin (1.5 microM), which binds and inactivates NO, blocked the hyperpolarizing and vasorelaxant response to NO, but did not alter either response to acetylcholine. 5 These data show that, in the rat small mesenteric artery, membrane hyperpolarizations to NO and acetylcholine are mediated by different mechanisms, and that the hyperpolarizations to NO and acetylcholine are mediated by different mechanisms, and that the hyperpolarization induced by NO is not involved in the responses to acetylcholine. In addition, they provide evidence that the acetylcholine responses in this artery, which are endothelium-dependent, are not mediated by the release of NO.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

1 Acetylcholine caused a concentration-dependent smooth muscle hyperpolarization and relaxation in rat small mesenteric arteries (diameter at 100 mmHg 250-450 mm) stimulated with noradrenaline (3 microM). 2 Nitric oxide (NO), generated from either NO-gas or from acidified sodium nitrite, also induced smooth muscle hyperpolarization but only in the absence of active force. However, unlike the hyperpolarizations to acetylcholine, those to NO were abolished either by prior smooth muscle depolarization caused by noradrenaline, or by the K+ channel blocker, glibenclamide (3 microM). 3 Hyperpolarization and relaxation to acetylcholine were unaffected by prior exposure of the mesenteric artery to either the cyclo-oxygenase inhibitor, indomethacin (10 microM), or the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, NG-nitro-L-arginine (L-NNA, 100 microM). 4 Haemoglobin (1.5 microM), which binds and inactivates NO, blocked the hyperpolarizing and vasorelaxant response to NO, but did not alter either response to acetylcholine. 5 These data show that, in the rat small mesenteric artery, membrane hyperpolarizations to NO and acetylcholine are mediated by different mechanisms, and that the hyperpolarizations to NO and acetylcholine are mediated by different mechanisms, and that the hyperpolarization induced by NO is not involved in the responses to acetylcholine. In addition, they provide evidence that the acetylcholine responses in this artery, which are endothelium-dependent, are not mediated by the release of NO.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 358 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

1 Acetylcholine caused a concentration-dependent smooth muscle hyperpolarization and relaxation in rat small mesenteric arteries (diameter at 100 mmHg 250-450 mm) stimulated with noradrenaline (3 microM). 2 Nitric oxide (NO), generated from either NO-gas or from acidified sodium nitrite, also induced smooth muscle hyperpolarization but only in the absence of active force. However, unlike the hyperpolarizations to acetylcholine, those to NO were abolished either by prior smooth muscle depolarization caused by noradrenaline, or by the K+ channel blocker, glibenclamide (3 microM). 3 Hyperpolarization and relaxation to acetylcholine were unaffected by prior exposure of the mesenteric artery to either the cyclo-oxygenase inhibitor, indomethacin (10 microM), or the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, NG-nitro-L-arginine (L-NNA, 100 microM). 4 Haemoglobin (1.5 microM), which binds and inactivates NO, blocked the hyperpolarizing and vasorelaxant response to NO, but did not alter either response to acetylcholine. 5 These data show that, in the rat small mesenteric artery, membrane hyperpolarizations to NO and acetylcholine are mediated by different mechanisms, and that the hyperpolarizations to NO and acetylcholine are mediated by different mechanisms, and that the hyperpolarization induced by NO is not involved in the responses to acetylcholine. In addition, they provide evidence that the acetylcholine responses in this artery, which are endothelium-dependent, are not mediated by the release of NO.

Key concepts: Hyperpolarization (physics), Acetylcholine, Nitric oxide, Cromakalim, Chemistry, Mesenteric arteries, Internal medicine, Endocrinology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evidence that nitric oxide does not mediate the hyperpolarization and relaxation to acetylcholine in the rat small mesenteric artery — Research Paper | ScholarLens