2007International Journal of Public AdministrationRequires access

Does “Good Governance” Matter? Civil Service Reform in China

Bill K. P. Chou

Open publisher page 28 citations

Abstract

This article uses the concept of governance proposed to evaluate civil service reform in China. The article examines the objectives of the reform and queries the value of promoting the practices of “good governance.” While emphasizing good governance, the reform cannot achieve the ultimate objectives of “good governance” practices because the administration is not sufficiently insulated from political influence. Political considerations often prevail over sound personnel practices when important staffing decisions are made. The concern for reciprocity undermines a performance appraisal system with a feature of being more discriminating. It is argued that without a more comprehensive structural reform to improve the implementation structure of Chinese government, following doctrines of governance do not necessarily bring about high administrative efficiency and capacity.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article uses the concept of governance proposed to evaluate civil service reform in China. The article examines the objectives of the reform and queries the value of promoting the practices of “good governance.” While emphasizing good governance, the reform cannot achieve the ultimate objectives of “good governance” practices because the administration is not sufficiently insulated from political influence. Political considerations often prevail over sound personnel practices when important staffing decisions are made. The concern for reciprocity undermines a performance appraisal system with a feature of being more discriminating. It is argued that without a more comprehensive structural reform to improve the implementation structure of Chinese government, following doctrines of governance do not necessarily bring about high administrative efficiency and capacity.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 28 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article uses the concept of governance proposed to evaluate civil service reform in China. The article examines the objectives of the reform and queries the value of promoting the practices of “good governance.” While emphasizing good governance, the reform cannot achieve the ultimate objectives of “good governance” practices because the administration is not sufficiently insulated from political influence. Political considerations often prevail over sound personnel practices when important staffing decisions are made. The concern for reciprocity undermines a performance appraisal system with a feature of being more discriminating. It is argued that without a more comprehensive structural reform to improve the implementation structure of Chinese government, following doctrines of governance do not necessarily bring about high administrative efficiency and capacity.

Key concepts: Corporate governance, Politics, Civil service, China, Staffing, Public administration, Good governance, Reciprocity (cultural anthropology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Does “Good Governance” Matter? Civil Service Reform in China — Research Paper | ScholarLens