Techniques for Odor Measurement: Olfactometric vs. Sniffing
Herbert Stone
Abstract
Herbert Stone
Abstract
SUMMARY Two techniques of odor testing, olfactometrie vs. sniffing, were compared with propionic acid used for the test odor. The olfactometer was more rapid and reliable as a technique for odor testing. Subjects appeared more sensitive by the sniff‐method, hut there were discrepancies in the data. The vapor phase above solutions of propionic acid in mineral oil was studied with propionic acid‐l‐C 14 . Evidence is presented for the existence of non ideal solutions. The significance of these data is discussed in terms of present techniques for odor testing, and their implications for future olfactory investigation.
OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
SUMMARY Two techniques of odor testing, olfactometrie vs. sniffing, were compared with propionic acid used for the test odor. The olfactometer was more rapid and reliable as a technique for odor testing. Subjects appeared more sensitive by the sniff‐method, hut there were discrepancies in the data. The vapor phase above solutions of propionic acid in mineral oil was studied with propionic acid‐l‐C 14 . Evidence is presented for the existence of non ideal solutions. The significance of these data is discussed in terms of present techniques for odor testing, and their implications for future olfactory investigation.
Key concepts: Odor, Olfactometer, Sniffing, Chemistry, Olfactometry, Chromatography, Psychology, Biology