Generating Curriculum and Instructional Innovations through School-Based Management
Peter J. Robertson, Priscilla Wohlstetter, Susan Albers Mohrman
Abstract
Peter J. Robertson, Priscilla Wohlstetter, Susan Albers Mohrman
Abstract
This study examined how schools utilize school-based management to introduce curriculum and instructional changes. It builds on previous research which concluded that school-based management can be more effective when the conditions associated with high-involvement organizations-namely, the decentralization of power, knowledge and skills, information, and rewards-are in place. In the present research, we assessed the extent to which these four conditions along with three other factors-an instructional guidance system, leadership, and resources-facilitated the implementation of four categories of curriculum and instructional innovations. Data from seventeen schools in eight locations supported the premise that higher levels of reform take place when higher levels of more of these supporting conditions are present at a school Furthermore, all of these conditions, with the possible exception of resources, appear to be instrumental in facilitating these innovations. A number of avenues for future research are suggested.
OpenAlex reports 53 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This study examined how schools utilize school-based management to introduce curriculum and instructional changes. It builds on previous research which concluded that school-based management can be more effective when the conditions associated with high-involvement organizations-namely, the decentralization of power, knowledge and skills, information, and rewards-are in place. In the present research, we assessed the extent to which these four conditions along with three other factors-an instructional guidance system, leadership, and resources-facilitated the implementation of four categories of curriculum and instructional innovations. Data from seventeen schools in eight locations supported the premise that higher levels of reform take place when higher levels of more of these supporting conditions are present at a school Furthermore, all of these conditions, with the possible exception of resources, appear to be instrumental in facilitating these innovations. A number of avenues for future research are suggested.
Key concepts: Curriculum, Premise, Decentralization, Mathematics education, Instructional leadership, Power (physics), Curriculum development, Pedagogy