Intravascular ultrasound-guided balloon angioplasty for treatment of in-stent restenosis
Tsunemori Sakamoto, Takahiko Kawarabayashi, Haruyuki Taguchi, Atsushi Tanaka, Yukio Nishida, Kenei Shimada, Junichi Yoshikawa
Abstract
Tsunemori Sakamoto, Takahiko Kawarabayashi, Haruyuki Taguchi, Atsushi Tanaka, Yukio Nishida, Kenei Shimada, Junichi Yoshikawa
Abstract
We investigated the usefulness of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis in 37 lesions of 34 consecutive patients. We divided these patients into two groups: a group in which the balloon size was determined by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA group; 17 patients, 19 lesions) and a group in which the balloon size was determined by IVUS (IVUS group; 17 patients, 18 lesions). We compared short-term and 6-month outcomes for these groups. In the IVUS group, we used a balloon of a size equal to 95% of the media-to-media diameter at the distal to the stent, as determined by IVUS. No significant differences were observed in patient or lesion characteristics between the two groups. The clinical success rate was 100% in both groups, and no clinical events were observed in either of the groups. The balloon/artery ratio was larger in the IVUS group than in the QCA group (1.33 +/- 0.35 vs. 1.16 +/- 0.13, P < 0.05), and the recurrent restenosis rate was lower (17% vs. 53%, P < 0.05). These results suggest that repeat balloon angioplasty using a balloon size determined by IVUS is useful for in-stent restenosis. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Intervent. 47:298-303, 1999.
OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We investigated the usefulness of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis in 37 lesions of 34 consecutive patients. We divided these patients into two groups: a group in which the balloon size was determined by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA group; 17 patients, 19 lesions) and a group in which the balloon size was determined by IVUS (IVUS group; 17 patients, 18 lesions). We compared short-term and 6-month outcomes for these groups. In the IVUS group, we used a balloon of a size equal to 95% of the media-to-media diameter at the distal to the stent, as determined by IVUS. No significant differences were observed in patient or lesion characteristics between the two groups. The clinical success rate was 100% in both groups, and no clinical events were observed in either of the groups. The balloon/artery ratio was larger in the IVUS group than in the QCA group (1.33 +/- 0.35 vs. 1.16 +/- 0.13, P < 0.05), and the recurrent restenosis rate was lower (17% vs. 53%, P < 0.05). These results suggest that repeat balloon angioplasty using a balloon size determined by IVUS is useful for in-stent restenosis. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Intervent. 47:298-303, 1999.
Key concepts: Medicine, Intravascular ultrasound, Restenosis, Balloon, Angioplasty, Radiology, Stent, Angiography