1999NASSP BulletinRequires access

Documentation in Teacher Evaluation: What Does the Professional Literature Say?

Kathleen Sullivan, Perry A. Zirkel

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

The professional literature concerning teacher evaluation is extensive, but the sources specific to documentation are relatively limited. Here is a practical synthesis of the relevant sources; the five types of documentation memoranda; and the leading lessons for doing documentation successfully.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The professional literature concerning teacher evaluation is extensive, but the sources specific to documentation are relatively limited. Here is a practical synthesis of the relevant sources; the five types of documentation memoranda; and the leading lessons for doing documentation successfully.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The professional literature concerning teacher evaluation is extensive, but the sources specific to documentation are relatively limited. Here is a practical synthesis of the relevant sources; the five types of documentation memoranda; and the leading lessons for doing documentation successfully.

Key concepts: Documentation, Professional development, Psychology, Medical education, Pedagogy, Computer science, Medicine, Programming language

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Documentation in Teacher Evaluation: What Does the Professional Literature Say? — Research Paper | ScholarLens