Bluffing and the “Split-The-Difference” Theory of Wage Bargaining
Roger L. Bowlby, William R. Schriver
Abstract
Roger L. Bowlby, William R. Schriver
Abstract
Focuses on a study that analyzed trade-union demands and employer offers from the collective bargaining experience between the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) and the Tennessee Valley Trades and Labor Council. Background on collective bargaining practice at TVA; Details of the split-the-difference wage bargaining model; Discussion of the theory of differential bluffing and statistical evidence. (Abstract copyright EBSCO.)
OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Focuses on a study that analyzed trade-union demands and employer offers from the collective bargaining experience between the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) and the Tennessee Valley Trades and Labor Council. Background on collective bargaining practice at TVA; Details of the split-the-difference wage bargaining model; Discussion of the theory of differential bluffing and statistical evidence. (Abstract copyright EBSCO.)
Key concepts: Collective bargaining, Wage, Differential (mechanical device), Wage bargaining, Economics, Labour economics, Significant difference, Bargaining power