1983•BMJOpen access

Impact of venography on the diagnosis and management of deep vein thrombosis.

L E Ramsay

Open full text 35 citations

Abstract

In general medical patients presenting with suspected deep vein thrombosis routine use of x ray venography was associated with a large fall in the proportion of patients with a final diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis, from 83% to 25% (p less than 0.001), and with an appreciable shortening of hospital stay, from 13.6 to 7.2 days. The diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis was rejected in only 4% of patients when a venogram was not performed, and it is estimated that two patients were treated with anticoagulants unnecessarily for every patient treated correctly. The risk, expense, and inconvenience of unnecessary anticoagulant treatment far exceeds the risk, expense, and inconvenience of performing venograms routinely. The common practice of misdiagnosing deep vein thrombosis clinically should be abandoned.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In general medical patients presenting with suspected deep vein thrombosis routine use of x ray venography was associated with a large fall in the proportion of patients with a final diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis, from 83% to 25% (p less than 0.001), and with an appreciable shortening of hospital stay, from 13.6 to 7.2 days. The diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis was rejected in only 4% of patients when a venogram was not performed, and it is estimated that two patients were treated with anticoagulants unnecessarily for every patient treated correctly. The risk, expense, and inconvenience of unnecessary anticoagulant treatment far exceeds the risk, expense, and inconvenience of performing venograms routinely. The common practice of misdiagnosing deep vein thrombosis clinically should be abandoned.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 35 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In general medical patients presenting with suspected deep vein thrombosis routine use of x ray venography was associated with a large fall in the proportion of patients with a final diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis, from 83% to 25% (p less than 0.001), and with an appreciable shortening of hospital stay, from 13.6 to 7.2 days. The diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis was rejected in only 4% of patients when a venogram was not performed, and it is estimated that two patients were treated with anticoagulants unnecessarily for every patient treated correctly. The risk, expense, and inconvenience of unnecessary anticoagulant treatment far exceeds the risk, expense, and inconvenience of performing venograms routinely. The common practice of misdiagnosing deep vein thrombosis clinically should be abandoned.

Key concepts: Deep vein, Medicine, Venography, Thrombosis, Radiology, Surgery, Vein

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Impact of venography on the diagnosis and management of deep vein thrombosis. — Research Paper | ScholarLens