Prestige and the University Press
Steven E. Gump
Abstract
Steven E. Gump
Abstract
The rhetoric of prestige vis-à-vis university presses has taken many forms in the pages of this journal over the last thirty-six years. Two main types of prestige by association are identified in this article: institutional prestige (to host universities) and individual prestige (to authors and administrators at the host institutions). Although ‘manipulating’ prestige may be difficult, holding dear the original mission of university presses may help to strengthen the status and image of university presses, even in times of financial hardship.
OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The rhetoric of prestige vis-à-vis university presses has taken many forms in the pages of this journal over the last thirty-six years. Two main types of prestige by association are identified in this article: institutional prestige (to host universities) and individual prestige (to authors and administrators at the host institutions). Although ‘manipulating’ prestige may be difficult, holding dear the original mission of university presses may help to strengthen the status and image of university presses, even in times of financial hardship.
Key concepts: Prestige, Sociology, Media studies, Philosophy, Linguistics