1990ErgonomicsRequires access

Error analysis and in-depth accident studies

G Malaterre

Open publisher page 56 citations

Abstract

After the first two years of data collection, four research specialists involved in the In-Depth Accident Study (IDAS) which was carried out in Salon-de-Provence (France), analysed 72 accidents (115 road users). The aim was to improve methodology, and to gather aggregated data which could be used to start exploratory research on specific topics. One of these was called 'task and error analysis', because an attempt was made to find out which mechanisms led to failures in the function event sequence, and link these failures with the activities being carried out by the road user at that time. Different aspects were considered, mainly task competition, attention distribution, and time pressure. The results were expressed in a typology of accident mechanisms, with a description of 15 main categories which fitted the data adequately. It is hoped that the similarities in accident causation which are shown up in each category will lead to similarities in preventive or remedial measures.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

After the first two years of data collection, four research specialists involved in the In-Depth Accident Study (IDAS) which was carried out in Salon-de-Provence (France), analysed 72 accidents (115 road users). The aim was to improve methodology, and to gather aggregated data which could be used to start exploratory research on specific topics. One of these was called 'task and error analysis', because an attempt was made to find out which mechanisms led to failures in the function event sequence, and link these failures with the activities being carried out by the road user at that time. Different aspects were considered, mainly task competition, attention distribution, and time pressure. The results were expressed in a typology of accident mechanisms, with a description of 15 main categories which fitted the data adequately. It is hoped that the similarities in accident causation which are shown up in each category will lead to similarities in preventive or remedial measures.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 56 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

After the first two years of data collection, four research specialists involved in the In-Depth Accident Study (IDAS) which was carried out in Salon-de-Provence (France), analysed 72 accidents (115 road users). The aim was to improve methodology, and to gather aggregated data which could be used to start exploratory research on specific topics. One of these was called 'task and error analysis', because an attempt was made to find out which mechanisms led to failures in the function event sequence, and link these failures with the activities being carried out by the road user at that time. Different aspects were considered, mainly task competition, attention distribution, and time pressure. The results were expressed in a typology of accident mechanisms, with a description of 15 main categories which fitted the data adequately. It is hoped that the similarities in accident causation which are shown up in each category will lead to similarities in preventive or remedial measures.

Key concepts: Accident (philosophy), Remedial education, Typology, Task (project management), Event (particle physics), Causation, Computer science, Salon

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Error analysis and in-depth accident studies — Research Paper | ScholarLens