AN ANALYSIS OF CAPACITY PLANNING PROCEDURES FOR A MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS PLANNING SYSTEM*
Thomas Schmitt, William L. Berry, Thomas E. Vollmann
Abstract
Thomas Schmitt, William L. Berry, Thomas E. Vollmann
Abstract
ABSTRACT This paper is concerned with planning work‐center capacity levels in manufacturing firms that employ a material requirements planning (MRP) system. It presents four procedures for developing work‐center capacity plans designed to insure the production of components and assemblies as specified by the MRP plan and the master production schedule (MPS). These procedures (capacity planning using overall factors, capacity bills, resource profiles, and capacity requirements planning) are compared using simulation analysis. The results indicate that the performance of a procedure when measured against the MPS depends on the operating conditions of the manufacturing system. The results also indicate that the choice of a particular procedure often represents a compromise among the benefits of improved MPS performance, the costs of preparing and processing data, and the premium expenses required for more frequent adjustments in work‐center capacity levels.
OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
ABSTRACT This paper is concerned with planning work‐center capacity levels in manufacturing firms that employ a material requirements planning (MRP) system. It presents four procedures for developing work‐center capacity plans designed to insure the production of components and assemblies as specified by the MRP plan and the master production schedule (MPS). These procedures (capacity planning using overall factors, capacity bills, resource profiles, and capacity requirements planning) are compared using simulation analysis. The results indicate that the performance of a procedure when measured against the MPS depends on the operating conditions of the manufacturing system. The results also indicate that the choice of a particular procedure often represents a compromise among the benefits of improved MPS performance, the costs of preparing and processing data, and the premium expenses required for more frequent adjustments in work‐center capacity levels.
Key concepts: Capacity planning, Material requirements planning, Work (physics), Plan (archaeology), Computer science, Manufacturing resource planning, Production (economics), Schedule