1984•Decision SciencesRequires access

AN ANALYSIS OF CAPACITY PLANNING PROCEDURES FOR A MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS PLANNING SYSTEM*

Thomas Schmitt, William L. Berry, Thomas E. Vollmann

Open publisher page 20 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper is concerned with planning work‐center capacity levels in manufacturing firms that employ a material requirements planning (MRP) system. It presents four procedures for developing work‐center capacity plans designed to insure the production of components and assemblies as specified by the MRP plan and the master production schedule (MPS). These procedures (capacity planning using overall factors, capacity bills, resource profiles, and capacity requirements planning) are compared using simulation analysis. The results indicate that the performance of a procedure when measured against the MPS depends on the operating conditions of the manufacturing system. The results also indicate that the choice of a particular procedure often represents a compromise among the benefits of improved MPS performance, the costs of preparing and processing data, and the premium expenses required for more frequent adjustments in work‐center capacity levels.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

ABSTRACT This paper is concerned with planning work‐center capacity levels in manufacturing firms that employ a material requirements planning (MRP) system. It presents four procedures for developing work‐center capacity plans designed to insure the production of components and assemblies as specified by the MRP plan and the master production schedule (MPS). These procedures (capacity planning using overall factors, capacity bills, resource profiles, and capacity requirements planning) are compared using simulation analysis. The results indicate that the performance of a procedure when measured against the MPS depends on the operating conditions of the manufacturing system. The results also indicate that the choice of a particular procedure often represents a compromise among the benefits of improved MPS performance, the costs of preparing and processing data, and the premium expenses required for more frequent adjustments in work‐center capacity levels.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

ABSTRACT This paper is concerned with planning work‐center capacity levels in manufacturing firms that employ a material requirements planning (MRP) system. It presents four procedures for developing work‐center capacity plans designed to insure the production of components and assemblies as specified by the MRP plan and the master production schedule (MPS). These procedures (capacity planning using overall factors, capacity bills, resource profiles, and capacity requirements planning) are compared using simulation analysis. The results indicate that the performance of a procedure when measured against the MPS depends on the operating conditions of the manufacturing system. The results also indicate that the choice of a particular procedure often represents a compromise among the benefits of improved MPS performance, the costs of preparing and processing data, and the premium expenses required for more frequent adjustments in work‐center capacity levels.

Key concepts: Capacity planning, Material requirements planning, Work (physics), Plan (archaeology), Computer science, Manufacturing resource planning, Production (economics), Schedule

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
AN ANALYSIS OF CAPACITY PLANNING PROCEDURES FOR A MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS PLANNING SYSTEM* — Research Paper | ScholarLens