2011•Journal of Adhesion Science and TechnologyRequires access

Apparent Surface Free Energy of Superhydrophobic Surfaces

Emil Chibowski

Open publisher page 28 citations

Abstract

Superhydrophobicity results from nano- and/or micro- protrusions present on a hydrophobic surface. Such surfaces are commonly characterized by water advancing contact angle, which amounts to at least 150°. Contact angle hysteresis also appears on such surfaces. Generally, two types of wetting are usually considered for rough surfaces, i.e., the drop suspended on the protrusions (Cassie–Baxter case), or the collapsed drop (Wenzel case). In the case of arranged posts present on a superhydrophobic surface some experiments show that the advancing contact angle does not change while the receding one depends on the post size (height, width) and spacing. In this paper it is shown that better insight can be gained into wetting properties of superhydrophobic surfaces if their apparent surface free energy is calculated from an equation relating the probe liquid surface tension and its advancing and receding contact angles, i.e., the contact angle hysteresis. With the help of the equation mentioned above the two cases of wetting can be distinguished. Some simulated and experimental results are presented.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Superhydrophobicity results from nano- and/or micro- protrusions present on a hydrophobic surface. Such surfaces are commonly characterized by water advancing contact angle, which amounts to at least 150°. Contact angle hysteresis also appears on such surfaces. Generally, two types of wetting are usually considered for rough surfaces, i.e., the drop suspended on the protrusions (Cassie–Baxter case), or the collapsed drop (Wenzel case). In the case of arranged posts present on a superhydrophobic surface some experiments show that the advancing contact angle does not change while the receding one depends on the post size (height, width) and spacing. In this paper it is shown that better insight can be gained into wetting properties of superhydrophobic surfaces if their apparent surface free energy is calculated from an equation relating the probe liquid surface tension and its advancing and receding contact angles, i.e., the contact angle hysteresis. With the help of the equation mentioned above the two cases of wetting can be distinguished. Some simulated and experimental results are presented.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 28 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Superhydrophobicity results from nano- and/or micro- protrusions present on a hydrophobic surface. Such surfaces are commonly characterized by water advancing contact angle, which amounts to at least 150°. Contact angle hysteresis also appears on such surfaces. Generally, two types of wetting are usually considered for rough surfaces, i.e., the drop suspended on the protrusions (Cassie–Baxter case), or the collapsed drop (Wenzel case). In the case of arranged posts present on a superhydrophobic surface some experiments show that the advancing contact angle does not change while the receding one depends on the post size (height, width) and spacing. In this paper it is shown that better insight can be gained into wetting properties of superhydrophobic surfaces if their apparent surface free energy is calculated from an equation relating the probe liquid surface tension and its advancing and receding contact angles, i.e., the contact angle hysteresis. With the help of the equation mentioned above the two cases of wetting can be distinguished. Some simulated and experimental results are presented.

Key concepts: Contact angle, Wetting, Wetting transition, Materials science, Hysteresis, Surface energy, Sessile drop technique, Surface tension

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Apparent Surface Free Energy of Superhydrophobic Surfaces — Research Paper | ScholarLens