2010American Journal of Economics and Business AdministrationOpen access

Waves of Knowledge Management: The Flow between Explicit and Tacit Knowledge

Stevens

Open full text 32 citations

Abstract

Problem statement: Knowledge Management (KM) is often equated with content management.Indeed, robust knowledge management processes include a database; but, information becomes knowledge when it is understood, manipulated and can become tied to a purpose or idea.By equating KM with content management and by equating the purpose of KM with predictability and control, companies may inadvertently de-emphasize knowledge creation and transfer.To keep pace with global market dynamics, an explicit focus on the creation and transference of new knowledge and transferring has to be encouraged.Companies that are able to foster new knowledge creation and transference alongside the more traditional view of KM are able to strike a balance between effectiveness and efficiency and between innovation and productivity.But, how do companies foster knowledge creation and, further, how do they transfer such knowledge?Approach: The purpose of this study was to explore the various connections between knowledge transfer focusing on explicit and tacit knowledge.Results: The research argued and resulted impacting the discipline of Knowledge Transfer (KT).The discipline's main ideas and their directions and limitations were examined.Conclusion: Additionally, the researchers proposed a knowledge transfer model which diagrams the transfer flow between explicit and tacit knowledge.The authors put forth a new direction of exploration in the transference of explicit and tacit knowledge-the knowledge transfer flow model.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Problem statement: Knowledge Management (KM) is often equated with content management.Indeed, robust knowledge management processes include a database; but, information becomes knowledge when it is understood, manipulated and can become tied to a purpose or idea.By equating KM with content management and by equating the purpose of KM with predictability and control, companies may inadvertently de-emphasize knowledge creation and transfer.To keep pace with global market dynamics, an explicit focus on the creation and transference of new knowledge and transferring has to be encouraged.Companies that are able to foster new knowledge creation and transference alongside the more traditional view of KM are able to strike a balance between effectiveness and efficiency and between innovation and productivity.But, how do companies foster knowledge creation and, further, how do they transfer such knowledge?Approach: The purpose of this study was to explore the various connections between knowledge transfer focusing on explicit and tacit knowledge.Results: The research argued and resulted impacting the discipline of Knowledge Transfer (KT).The discipline's main ideas and their directions and limitations were examined.Conclusion: Additionally, the researchers proposed a knowledge transfer model which diagrams the transfer flow between explicit and tacit knowledge.The authors put forth a new direction of exploration in the transference of explicit and tacit knowledge-the knowledge transfer flow model.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 32 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Problem statement: Knowledge Management (KM) is often equated with content management.Indeed, robust knowledge management processes include a database; but, information becomes knowledge when it is understood, manipulated and can become tied to a purpose or idea.By equating KM with content management and by equating the purpose of KM with predictability and control, companies may inadvertently de-emphasize knowledge creation and transfer.To keep pace with global market dynamics, an explicit focus on the creation and transference of new knowledge and transferring has to be encouraged.Companies that are able to foster new knowledge creation and transference alongside the more traditional view of KM are able to strike a balance between effectiveness and efficiency and between innovation and productivity.But, how do companies foster knowledge creation and, further, how do they transfer such knowledge?Approach: The purpose of this study was to explore the various connections between knowledge transfer focusing on explicit and tacit knowledge.Results: The research argued and resulted impacting the discipline of Knowledge Transfer (KT).The discipline's main ideas and their directions and limitations were examined.Conclusion: Additionally, the researchers proposed a knowledge transfer model which diagrams the transfer flow between explicit and tacit knowledge.The authors put forth a new direction of exploration in the transference of explicit and tacit knowledge-the knowledge transfer flow model.

Key concepts: Tacit knowledge, Explicit knowledge, Knowledge management, Personal knowledge management, Knowledge value chain, Knowledge transfer, Procedural knowledge, Organizational learning

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Waves of Knowledge Management: The Flow between Explicit and Tacit Knowledge — Research Paper | ScholarLens