1988Infection Control and Hospital EpidemiologyRequires access

Legal Comment, Part I: Basics of Liability Law

William W. Hesson, Cynthia W. Thu

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

This article, the first in a series that will explore the legal implications of hospital infection control, outlines the basic legal principles applicable to infection control. Future articles will discuss the issue of confidentiality and apply general principles to the specific issues surrounding AIDS.In order to succeed in a medical malpractice action, the plaintiff must demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that: (1) the defendant(s) had a duty to act in a particular manner; (2) the defendant(s) negligently breached that duty; (3) the plaintiff suffered some “harm” or injury; and (4) the harm suffered by the plaintiff was causally related to the breach of duty.'Physicians and hospitals have a duty, once a patient care provider relationship has been created, to provide care to the best of their skill, training, and experience.' A significant aspect of that duty for hospitals is the creation and maintenance of an environment that is safe from unnecessary risk of infection or harm.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article, the first in a series that will explore the legal implications of hospital infection control, outlines the basic legal principles applicable to infection control. Future articles will discuss the issue of confidentiality and apply general principles to the specific issues surrounding AIDS.In order to succeed in a medical malpractice action, the plaintiff must demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that: (1) the defendant(s) had a duty to act in a particular manner; (2) the defendant(s) negligently breached that duty; (3) the plaintiff suffered some “harm” or injury; and (4) the harm suffered by the plaintiff was causally related to the breach of duty.'Physicians and hospitals have a duty, once a patient care provider relationship has been created, to provide care to the best of their skill, training, and experience.' A significant aspect of that duty for hospitals is the creation and maintenance of an environment that is safe from unnecessary risk of infection or harm.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article, the first in a series that will explore the legal implications of hospital infection control, outlines the basic legal principles applicable to infection control. Future articles will discuss the issue of confidentiality and apply general principles to the specific issues surrounding AIDS.In order to succeed in a medical malpractice action, the plaintiff must demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that: (1) the defendant(s) had a duty to act in a particular manner; (2) the defendant(s) negligently breached that duty; (3) the plaintiff suffered some “harm” or injury; and (4) the harm suffered by the plaintiff was causally related to the breach of duty.'Physicians and hospitals have a duty, once a patient care provider relationship has been created, to provide care to the best of their skill, training, and experience.' A significant aspect of that duty for hospitals is the creation and maintenance of an environment that is safe from unnecessary risk of infection or harm.

Key concepts: Plaintiff, Harm, Duty of care, Malpractice, Duty, Liability, Duty to warn, Confidentiality

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Legal Comment, Part I: Basics of Liability Law — Research Paper | ScholarLens