Res ipsa loquitur in medical malpractice law.
Van Dokkum N
Abstract
Van Dokkum N
Abstract
The South African courts have successfully avoided the proliferation of medical malpractice suits that is the America experience by implementing various mechanisms that are clearly protective of the medical practitioner whilst increasing the burden on the patient-plaintiff. Whilst the motive is laudable this has often led to tragic results and bizarre precedent.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The South African courts have successfully avoided the proliferation of medical malpractice suits that is the America experience by implementing various mechanisms that are clearly protective of the medical practitioner whilst increasing the burden on the patient-plaintiff. Whilst the motive is laudable this has often led to tragic results and bizarre precedent.
Key concepts: Res ipsa loquitur, Plaintiff, Malpractice, Medical malpractice, Medical negligence, Law, Tort, Political science