2003Orbis LitterarumRequires access

A Subject After All – Rethinking the ‘personalized narrator’ of the self‐reflexive first‐person novels of O'Brien, Beckett and Banville

Lene Yding Pedersen

Open publisher page 16 citations

Abstract

This essay suggests a way of getting beyond the ‘personalized’ narrator traditionally seen as defining the first‐person novel, without giving up completely the idea of an existential relationship between narrator and character. It explores the construction of a subject after all in three self‐reflexive first‐person novels (The Third Policeman, Malone Dies, Ghosts). These self‐reflexive first‐person novels cannot be explained within the existing framework of theories about the first‐person novel as they question and partly undermine the notion of the personalized narrator as a more or less unproblematic entity. To see how this subject is constructed in these self‐reflexive novels, this essay rethinks the ‘experiencing I’ and the ‘narrating I’ respectively in the light of Paul Ricoeur's concept of ‘narrative identity’ and Rimmon‐Kenan's concept of ‘access’. This leads to the notions of a ‘storied subject’ and a ‘speaking subject’. Furthermore it argues that we need to take into consideration a third aspect of the subject, the ‘linguistic subject’ (theoretically based on Benveniste) in order to comprehend the subject of the self‐reflexive first‐person novel.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This essay suggests a way of getting beyond the ‘personalized’ narrator traditionally seen as defining the first‐person novel, without giving up completely the idea of an existential relationship between narrator and character. It explores the construction of a subject after all in three self‐reflexive first‐person novels (The Third Policeman, Malone Dies, Ghosts). These self‐reflexive first‐person novels cannot be explained within the existing framework of theories about the first‐person novel as they question and partly undermine the notion of the personalized narrator as a more or less unproblematic entity. To see how this subject is constructed in these self‐reflexive novels, this essay rethinks the ‘experiencing I’ and the ‘narrating I’ respectively in the light of Paul Ricoeur's concept of ‘narrative identity’ and Rimmon‐Kenan's concept of ‘access’. This leads to the notions of a ‘storied subject’ and a ‘speaking subject’. Furthermore it argues that we need to take into consideration a third aspect of the subject, the ‘linguistic subject’ (theoretically based on Benveniste) in order to comprehend the subject of the self‐reflexive first‐person novel.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This essay suggests a way of getting beyond the ‘personalized’ narrator traditionally seen as defining the first‐person novel, without giving up completely the idea of an existential relationship between narrator and character. It explores the construction of a subject after all in three self‐reflexive first‐person novels (The Third Policeman, Malone Dies, Ghosts). These self‐reflexive first‐person novels cannot be explained within the existing framework of theories about the first‐person novel as they question and partly undermine the notion of the personalized narrator as a more or less unproblematic entity. To see how this subject is constructed in these self‐reflexive novels, this essay rethinks the ‘experiencing I’ and the ‘narrating I’ respectively in the light of Paul Ricoeur's concept of ‘narrative identity’ and Rimmon‐Kenan's concept of ‘access’. This leads to the notions of a ‘storied subject’ and a ‘speaking subject’. Furthermore it argues that we need to take into consideration a third aspect of the subject, the ‘linguistic subject’ (theoretically based on Benveniste) in order to comprehend the subject of the self‐reflexive first‐person novel.

Key concepts: Subject (documents), Reflexivity, Narrative, Identity (music), Existentialism, Self, Reflexive pronoun, Third person

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Subject After All – Rethinking the ‘personalized narrator’ of the self‐reflexive first‐person novels of O'Brien, Beckett and Banville — Research Paper | ScholarLens