THE ARBITRABILITY OF ANTITRUST DISPUTES: FREEDOM TO CONTRACT FOR AN ALTERNATIVE FORUM
Thomas J. Brewer
Abstract
Thomas J. Brewer
Abstract
Until recently, federal courts refused to enforce contractual provisions mandating arbitration of disputes arising under the federal antitrust laws.1 The general public interest in vigorous enforcement of the antitrust statutes, the complexity of issues often encountered in antitrust cases, the federal courts' exclusive jurisdiction over disputes arising under the federal antitrust statutes, and various other factors were all advanced to justify the courts' refusals to enforce arbitration agreements in antitrust disputes.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Until recently, federal courts refused to enforce contractual provisions mandating arbitration of disputes arising under the federal antitrust laws.1 The general public interest in vigorous enforcement of the antitrust statutes, the complexity of issues often encountered in antitrust cases, the federal courts' exclusive jurisdiction over disputes arising under the federal antitrust statutes, and various other factors were all advanced to justify the courts' refusals to enforce arbitration agreements in antitrust disputes.
Key concepts: Arbitration, Statute, Enforcement, Consent decree, Jurisdiction, Law, Federal Arbitration Act, Compulsory arbitration