2016•Unpublished venueRequires access

FEDERALIST LESSONS FOR INTERNATIONAL ANTITRUST CONVERGENCE

Kevin O’Connor

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

The most prominent and, arguably, unique feature of the American system of antitrust enforcement is the multiplicity of potential plaintiffs who are permitted to challenge allegedly unlawful conduct under federal and state antitrust law.1 Not only are there two federal agencies with overlapping antitrust enforcement authority,2 other federal agencies possess the authority to block business transactions in certain industrial sectors.3 In addition, state attorneys general and private plaintiffs are empowered to sue under federal law to obtain damages and injunctive relief. Finally, many of these same potential plaintiffs have authority to sue under state antitrust laws, which, although similar to federal law, often present the potential plaintiff with remedies beyond those obtainable under federal law.4

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The most prominent and, arguably, unique feature of the American system of antitrust enforcement is the multiplicity of potential plaintiffs who are permitted to challenge allegedly unlawful conduct under federal and state antitrust law.1 Not only are there two federal agencies with overlapping antitrust enforcement authority,2 other federal agencies possess the authority to block business transactions in certain industrial sectors.3 In addition, state attorneys general and private plaintiffs are empowered to sue under federal law to obtain damages and injunctive relief. Finally, many of these same potential plaintiffs have authority to sue under state antitrust laws, which, although similar to federal law, often present the potential plaintiff with remedies beyond those obtainable under federal law.4

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The most prominent and, arguably, unique feature of the American system of antitrust enforcement is the multiplicity of potential plaintiffs who are permitted to challenge allegedly unlawful conduct under federal and state antitrust law.1 Not only are there two federal agencies with overlapping antitrust enforcement authority,2 other federal agencies possess the authority to block business transactions in certain industrial sectors.3 In addition, state attorneys general and private plaintiffs are empowered to sue under federal law to obtain damages and injunctive relief. Finally, many of these same potential plaintiffs have authority to sue under state antitrust laws, which, although similar to federal law, often present the potential plaintiff with remedies beyond those obtainable under federal law.4

Key concepts: Plaintiff, Law, Federalist, Damages, Enforcement, Federal law, Consent decree, State (computer science)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
FEDERALIST LESSONS FOR INTERNATIONAL ANTITRUST CONVERGENCE — Research Paper | ScholarLens