2006•Soccer and SocietyRequires access

Understanding Power and the Coach’s Role in Professional English Soccer: A Preliminary Investigation of Coach Behaviour

Paul Potrac, Robyn L. Jones, Christopher J. Cushion

Open publisher page 157 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the coaching behaviours of top‐level professional English soccer coaches within the practice environment. The Arizona State University Observation Instrument (ASUOI) was used to compile data on four coaches during three phases of a given season. The results indicated that the categories of ‘pre‐instruction’, ‘concurrent instruction’, and ‘post instruction’ represented 54.45 per cent of all the recorded behavioural intervals. In addition, the data indicated a substantial praise to scold ratio (approximately 23:1). While ‘praise’ represented 15.44 per cent of the total coded behaviours, ‘scold’ accounted for only 0.67 per cent. The overall trends and variations in coaching behaviour between the observed coaches are primarily discussed in relation to existing sociology research.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The purpose of this study was to analyze the coaching behaviours of top‐level professional English soccer coaches within the practice environment. The Arizona State University Observation Instrument (ASUOI) was used to compile data on four coaches during three phases of a given season. The results indicated that the categories of ‘pre‐instruction’, ‘concurrent instruction’, and ‘post instruction’ represented 54.45 per cent of all the recorded behavioural intervals. In addition, the data indicated a substantial praise to scold ratio (approximately 23:1). While ‘praise’ represented 15.44 per cent of the total coded behaviours, ‘scold’ accounted for only 0.67 per cent. The overall trends and variations in coaching behaviour between the observed coaches are primarily discussed in relation to existing sociology research.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 157 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the coaching behaviours of top‐level professional English soccer coaches within the practice environment. The Arizona State University Observation Instrument (ASUOI) was used to compile data on four coaches during three phases of a given season. The results indicated that the categories of ‘pre‐instruction’, ‘concurrent instruction’, and ‘post instruction’ represented 54.45 per cent of all the recorded behavioural intervals. In addition, the data indicated a substantial praise to scold ratio (approximately 23:1). While ‘praise’ represented 15.44 per cent of the total coded behaviours, ‘scold’ accounted for only 0.67 per cent. The overall trends and variations in coaching behaviour between the observed coaches are primarily discussed in relation to existing sociology research.

Key concepts: Praise, Coaching, Psychology, Power (physics), Mathematics education, Applied psychology, Pedagogy, Social psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Understanding Power and the Coach’s Role in Professional English Soccer: A Preliminary Investigation of Coach Behaviour — Research Paper | ScholarLens