2005IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor ManufacturingRequires access

Cu Planarization for ULSI Processing by Electrochemical Methods: A Review

Ian Ivar Suni, Boxue X. Du

Open publisher page 50 citations

Abstract

The planned introduction of porous, low-k dielectric materials into Si-based semiconductor devices will provide substantial challenges for chemical mechanical planarization. These challenges arise primarily from the mechanical fragility of such dielectrics, which may not withstand the force applied during chemical mechanical planarization. Planarization by Cu electropolishing has many advantages, including its noncontact nature, easy endpoint detection, and minimal introduction of contamination. However, pattern sensitivity may limit application of Cu electropolishing to augmenting, rather than completely replacing, chemical mechanical planarization. Electrochemical mechanical planarization appears to have less pattern dependence, but is still an evolving technology whose potential limitations are still unclear. Alternative electrochemical methods for Cu planarization, including electropolishing and electrochemical mechanical planarization are herein reviewed and discussed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The planned introduction of porous, low-k dielectric materials into Si-based semiconductor devices will provide substantial challenges for chemical mechanical planarization. These challenges arise primarily from the mechanical fragility of such dielectrics, which may not withstand the force applied during chemical mechanical planarization. Planarization by Cu electropolishing has many advantages, including its noncontact nature, easy endpoint detection, and minimal introduction of contamination. However, pattern sensitivity may limit application of Cu electropolishing to augmenting, rather than completely replacing, chemical mechanical planarization. Electrochemical mechanical planarization appears to have less pattern dependence, but is still an evolving technology whose potential limitations are still unclear. Alternative electrochemical methods for Cu planarization, including electropolishing and electrochemical mechanical planarization are herein reviewed and discussed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 50 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The planned introduction of porous, low-k dielectric materials into Si-based semiconductor devices will provide substantial challenges for chemical mechanical planarization. These challenges arise primarily from the mechanical fragility of such dielectrics, which may not withstand the force applied during chemical mechanical planarization. Planarization by Cu electropolishing has many advantages, including its noncontact nature, easy endpoint detection, and minimal introduction of contamination. However, pattern sensitivity may limit application of Cu electropolishing to augmenting, rather than completely replacing, chemical mechanical planarization. Electrochemical mechanical planarization appears to have less pattern dependence, but is still an evolving technology whose potential limitations are still unclear. Alternative electrochemical methods for Cu planarization, including electropolishing and electrochemical mechanical planarization are herein reviewed and discussed.

Key concepts: Chemical-mechanical planarization, Electropolishing, Materials science, Electrochemistry, Nanotechnology, Polishing, Dielectric, Optoelectronics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cu Planarization for ULSI Processing by Electrochemical Methods: A Review — Research Paper | ScholarLens