1988•Contemporary Music ReviewRequires access

The art of being ambiguous: From listening to composing

Kondō Jō

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

To explain the processes involved when making sounds into music, in the first three parts of this paper the author discusses how traditional syntactic devices help to emphasize cognitive relationships between sounds. In other words, these devices are based on various ways of grouping sounds.Due in good part to the gradual abandoning of traditional syntactic devices, many composers today are basing their sound‐structuring more and more on the expressive aspects of sounds, rather than the internal and abstract relationships that group sounds together. This tendency seems to make their music less abstract and more expressive in character.In this context, the author explains in the fourth part of this article his own empirical approach to composition, which consists, after all, in grouping sounds. Using examples from his own works, he illustrates how he has been able to write music of a certain abstractness and ambiguity, by applying conventional syntactic devices in a thoroughly empirical and non‐traditional way, a way that is based on his own ‘listening experience’.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

To explain the processes involved when making sounds into music, in the first three parts of this paper the author discusses how traditional syntactic devices help to emphasize cognitive relationships between sounds. In other words, these devices are based on various ways of grouping sounds.Due in good part to the gradual abandoning of traditional syntactic devices, many composers today are basing their sound‐structuring more and more on the expressive aspects of sounds, rather than the internal and abstract relationships that group sounds together. This tendency seems to make their music less abstract and more expressive in character.In this context, the author explains in the fourth part of this article his own empirical approach to composition, which consists, after all, in grouping sounds. Using examples from his own works, he illustrates how he has been able to write music of a certain abstractness and ambiguity, by applying conventional syntactic devices in a thoroughly empirical and non‐traditional way, a way that is based on his own ‘listening experience’.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

To explain the processes involved when making sounds into music, in the first three parts of this paper the author discusses how traditional syntactic devices help to emphasize cognitive relationships between sounds. In other words, these devices are based on various ways of grouping sounds.Due in good part to the gradual abandoning of traditional syntactic devices, many composers today are basing their sound‐structuring more and more on the expressive aspects of sounds, rather than the internal and abstract relationships that group sounds together. This tendency seems to make their music less abstract and more expressive in character.In this context, the author explains in the fourth part of this article his own empirical approach to composition, which consists, after all, in grouping sounds. Using examples from his own works, he illustrates how he has been able to write music of a certain abstractness and ambiguity, by applying conventional syntactic devices in a thoroughly empirical and non‐traditional way, a way that is based on his own ‘listening experience’.

Key concepts: Active listening, Ambiguity, Linguistics, Context (archaeology), Timbre, Composition (language), Computer science, Structuring

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The art of being ambiguous: From listening to composing — Research Paper | ScholarLens