Wealth Structuring—Common Considerations
Kees Stoute
Abstract
Kees Stoute
Abstract
This chapter sums up and describes nine considerations that might prove to be useful input when considering wealth structuring: (1) Wealth structuring can be complicated; (2) distinction between common and civil law; (3) differences among jurisdictions; (4) difficult to make cost-benefit analyses when results are intangible; (5) structures are dynamic—they might need to evolve; (6) structuring requires openness; (7) structuring requires commitment, knowledge, and priority (there are many “reasons” for not pursuing a proper structure); (8) trusts can be challenged; and (9) types of assets. Given the multitude of factors and considerations, it is important—and probably necessary—to work with specialists.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This chapter sums up and describes nine considerations that might prove to be useful input when considering wealth structuring: (1) Wealth structuring can be complicated; (2) distinction between common and civil law; (3) differences among jurisdictions; (4) difficult to make cost-benefit analyses when results are intangible; (5) structures are dynamic—they might need to evolve; (6) structuring requires openness; (7) structuring requires commitment, knowledge, and priority (there are many “reasons” for not pursuing a proper structure); (8) trusts can be challenged; and (9) types of assets. Given the multitude of factors and considerations, it is important—and probably necessary—to work with specialists.
Key concepts: Structuring, Multitude, Openness to experience, Risk analysis (engineering), Work (physics), Computer science, Knowledge management, Business