2014Unpublished venueRequires access

Wealth Structuring—Common Considerations

Kees Stoute

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter sums up and describes nine considerations that might prove to be useful input when considering wealth structuring: (1) Wealth structuring can be complicated; (2) distinction between common and civil law; (3) differences among jurisdictions; (4) difficult to make cost-benefit analyses when results are intangible; (5) structures are dynamic—they might need to evolve; (6) structuring requires openness; (7) structuring requires commitment, knowledge, and priority (there are many “reasons” for not pursuing a proper structure); (8) trusts can be challenged; and (9) types of assets. Given the multitude of factors and considerations, it is important—and probably necessary—to work with specialists.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter sums up and describes nine considerations that might prove to be useful input when considering wealth structuring: (1) Wealth structuring can be complicated; (2) distinction between common and civil law; (3) differences among jurisdictions; (4) difficult to make cost-benefit analyses when results are intangible; (5) structures are dynamic—they might need to evolve; (6) structuring requires openness; (7) structuring requires commitment, knowledge, and priority (there are many “reasons” for not pursuing a proper structure); (8) trusts can be challenged; and (9) types of assets. Given the multitude of factors and considerations, it is important—and probably necessary—to work with specialists.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter sums up and describes nine considerations that might prove to be useful input when considering wealth structuring: (1) Wealth structuring can be complicated; (2) distinction between common and civil law; (3) differences among jurisdictions; (4) difficult to make cost-benefit analyses when results are intangible; (5) structures are dynamic—they might need to evolve; (6) structuring requires openness; (7) structuring requires commitment, knowledge, and priority (there are many “reasons” for not pursuing a proper structure); (8) trusts can be challenged; and (9) types of assets. Given the multitude of factors and considerations, it is important—and probably necessary—to work with specialists.

Key concepts: Structuring, Multitude, Openness to experience, Risk analysis (engineering), Work (physics), Computer science, Knowledge management, Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Wealth Structuring—Common Considerations — Research Paper | ScholarLens