1963Perceptual and Motor SkillsRequires access

Effect of Phenothiazines on the Thinking of Acute Schizophrenics

R. Downing, John N. Ebert, Samuel J. Shubrooks

Open publisher page 19 citations

Abstract

Thirty-seven acute schizophrenic patients were given a test measuring the extent to which associatively linked distractors intruded themselves inappropriately into the generation of concepts. This test was given both upon admission to the hospital and after 6 wk. of treatment with Chlorpromazine, Fluphenazine, Thioridazine or placebo. Fluphenazine and Thioridazine produced a decrement in distractor-produced errors greater than that resulting from placebo. Changes produced by Chlorpromazine did not differ significantly from those of the placebo condition. There was a trend for Fluphenazine to be somewhat more effective than was Chlorpromazine. It was pointed out that, while both Fluphenazine and Thioridazine differ in chemical structure from Chlorpromazine, they differ markedly from each other. Some factors possibly accounting for the effectiveness of Fluphenazine were discussed, but such explanations could not be reconciled with the effectiveness of Thioridazine.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Thirty-seven acute schizophrenic patients were given a test measuring the extent to which associatively linked distractors intruded themselves inappropriately into the generation of concepts. This test was given both upon admission to the hospital and after 6 wk. of treatment with Chlorpromazine, Fluphenazine, Thioridazine or placebo. Fluphenazine and Thioridazine produced a decrement in distractor-produced errors greater than that resulting from placebo. Changes produced by Chlorpromazine did not differ significantly from those of the placebo condition. There was a trend for Fluphenazine to be somewhat more effective than was Chlorpromazine. It was pointed out that, while both Fluphenazine and Thioridazine differ in chemical structure from Chlorpromazine, they differ markedly from each other. Some factors possibly accounting for the effectiveness of Fluphenazine were discussed, but such explanations could not be reconciled with the effectiveness of Thioridazine.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Thirty-seven acute schizophrenic patients were given a test measuring the extent to which associatively linked distractors intruded themselves inappropriately into the generation of concepts. This test was given both upon admission to the hospital and after 6 wk. of treatment with Chlorpromazine, Fluphenazine, Thioridazine or placebo. Fluphenazine and Thioridazine produced a decrement in distractor-produced errors greater than that resulting from placebo. Changes produced by Chlorpromazine did not differ significantly from those of the placebo condition. There was a trend for Fluphenazine to be somewhat more effective than was Chlorpromazine. It was pointed out that, while both Fluphenazine and Thioridazine differ in chemical structure from Chlorpromazine, they differ markedly from each other. Some factors possibly accounting for the effectiveness of Fluphenazine were discussed, but such explanations could not be reconciled with the effectiveness of Thioridazine.

Key concepts: Thioridazine, Fluphenazine, Chlorpromazine, Placebo, Psychology, Schizophrenia (object-oriented programming), Psychiatry, Anesthesia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effect of Phenothiazines on the Thinking of Acute Schizophrenics — Research Paper | ScholarLens