1940•Archives of SurgeryRequires access

INTRATHECAL ADMINISTRATION OF TETANUS ANTITOXIN

Warfield M. Firor

Open publisher page 12 citations

Abstract

The treatment of clinical tetanus is in an uncertain and unsatisfactory state. The mortality is high; there is no agreement as to the form of treatment that gives the best results, and the therapeutic use of antitoxin has not brought about an appreciable decrease in the death rate. The explanation commonly given for this therapeutic failure is that tetanus antitoxin cannot neutralize toxin which has become fixed by the tissues. It is impossible to verify this statement in human beings, but with dogs Abel and his associates have thrown some light on the fate of tetanus toxin in the body.1They have shown that up to a certain time one or more lethal doses of toxin which are apparently fixed can still be neutralized if considerable excess of antitoxin is given, but if administration of antitoxin is delayed for too long a time the fixed toxin is not susceptible

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The treatment of clinical tetanus is in an uncertain and unsatisfactory state. The mortality is high; there is no agreement as to the form of treatment that gives the best results, and the therapeutic use of antitoxin has not brought about an appreciable decrease in the death rate. The explanation commonly given for this therapeutic failure is that tetanus antitoxin cannot neutralize toxin which has become fixed by the tissues. It is impossible to verify this statement in human beings, but with dogs Abel and his associates have thrown some light on the fate of tetanus toxin in the body.1They have shown that up to a certain time one or more lethal doses of toxin which are apparently fixed can still be neutralized if considerable excess of antitoxin is given, but if administration of antitoxin is delayed for too long a time the fixed toxin is not susceptible

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The treatment of clinical tetanus is in an uncertain and unsatisfactory state. The mortality is high; there is no agreement as to the form of treatment that gives the best results, and the therapeutic use of antitoxin has not brought about an appreciable decrease in the death rate. The explanation commonly given for this therapeutic failure is that tetanus antitoxin cannot neutralize toxin which has become fixed by the tissues. It is impossible to verify this statement in human beings, but with dogs Abel and his associates have thrown some light on the fate of tetanus toxin in the body.1They have shown that up to a certain time one or more lethal doses of toxin which are apparently fixed can still be neutralized if considerable excess of antitoxin is given, but if administration of antitoxin is delayed for too long a time the fixed toxin is not susceptible

Key concepts: Medicine, Tetanus antitoxin, Intrathecal, Tetanus, Antitoxin, Anesthesia, Administration (probate law), Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
INTRATHECAL ADMINISTRATION OF TETANUS ANTITOXIN — Research Paper | ScholarLens