2004•Cinema JournalRequires access

The State of Things

Robert P. Kolker

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

I find myself, near the end of a long career teaching film, and looking forward to a concentrated period when I can write about film and related matters, somewhat troubled and even a little saddened. I feel bad that for all our efforts and the intellectual and emotional energy we have brought to our discipline that it has not grown as fast as it should have. There are obviously many administrative and financial reasons for this, but I'm sure that, again, despite our best efforts, we have not been able to convince enough people that studying film is a serious business. I cannot avoid the thought that, for most people, the movies remain one of the few things that do not require intellectual engagement, and such people grow resentful when we try to say otherwise. Just look at a New York Times review of a museum exhibit or art opening, in which the formal elements of the artist's work are analyzed. Then turn to a movie review and what do you get: plot summary.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

I find myself, near the end of a long career teaching film, and looking forward to a concentrated period when I can write about film and related matters, somewhat troubled and even a little saddened. I feel bad that for all our efforts and the intellectual and emotional energy we have brought to our discipline that it has not grown as fast as it should have. There are obviously many administrative and financial reasons for this, but I'm sure that, again, despite our best efforts, we have not been able to convince enough people that studying film is a serious business. I cannot avoid the thought that, for most people, the movies remain one of the few things that do not require intellectual engagement, and such people grow resentful when we try to say otherwise. Just look at a New York Times review of a museum exhibit or art opening, in which the formal elements of the artist's work are analyzed. Then turn to a movie review and what do you get: plot summary.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

I find myself, near the end of a long career teaching film, and looking forward to a concentrated period when I can write about film and related matters, somewhat troubled and even a little saddened. I feel bad that for all our efforts and the intellectual and emotional energy we have brought to our discipline that it has not grown as fast as it should have. There are obviously many administrative and financial reasons for this, but I'm sure that, again, despite our best efforts, we have not been able to convince enough people that studying film is a serious business. I cannot avoid the thought that, for most people, the movies remain one of the few things that do not require intellectual engagement, and such people grow resentful when we try to say otherwise. Just look at a New York Times review of a museum exhibit or art opening, in which the formal elements of the artist's work are analyzed. Then turn to a movie review and what do you get: plot summary.

Key concepts: Resentment, Plot (graphics), Energy (signal processing), Period (music), State (computer science), Aesthetics, Sociology, Work (physics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The State of Things — Research Paper | ScholarLens