Walter H. Schmidt, W. L. Colville
Abstract
Synopsis Teosinte produced more forage on a wet basis but less dry matter per acre than either corn or forage sorghum. Neither forage quality nor yield was sufficiently great to place teosinte with corn or forage sorghum as a silage crop in irrigated regions of the central Great Plains.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Synopsis Teosinte produced more forage on a wet basis but less dry matter per acre than either corn or forage sorghum. Neither forage quality nor yield was sufficiently great to place teosinte with corn or forage sorghum as a silage crop in irrigated regions of the central Great Plains.
Key concepts: Forage, Sorghum, Agronomy, Silage, Fodder, Acre, Dry matter, Biology