1996•Archives of OphthalmologyRequires access

The Mechanical Properties of the Human Lens Capsule Following Capsulorhexis or Radiofrequency Diathermy Capsulotomy

James E. Morgan

Open publisher page 58 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the biomechanical properties of the capsulotomy edge following continuous-tear circular capsulorhexis (CTCC) or radiofrequency (RF) diathermy capsulotomy. METHODS: A test apparatus was constructed that allowed controlled stretching of capsulotomy edges following CTCC or RF diathermy capsulotomy. The lens contents were removed by phacoemulsification to permit the implantation of probes that exerted a test force on the capsulotomy edge and were moved in diametrically opposite directions using computer-controlled stepping motors. The magnitude of the force was measured during the capsule stretch, which allowed precise determination of the degree of capsular distention at the time of capsular rupture. Selected capsular edges were subsequently examined by scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS: The capsulotomy edge produced by CTCC was significantly stronger (P < .001) than that following RF. The mean (+/-SD) force to achieve capsule rupture was 0.15 +/- 0.06 N with CTCC compared with 0.02 +/- 0.01 N with RF. The mean (+/-SD) increase in the capsulotomy circumference was significantly greater with CTCC at 53% +/- 14.5% compared with RF at 18% +/- 8.5% (P < .001). Scanning electron microscopy disclosed a smooth edge for the CTCC capsulotomy. In contrast, multiple irregularities were seen in the edge following RF. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous-tear circular capsulorhexis provides a stronger capsulotomy and is the preferred method in routine cataract surgery. However, RF diathermy capsulotomy may have a useful role in conditions unfavorable to the safe completion of CTCC.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the biomechanical properties of the capsulotomy edge following continuous-tear circular capsulorhexis (CTCC) or radiofrequency (RF) diathermy capsulotomy. METHODS: A test apparatus was constructed that allowed controlled stretching of capsulotomy edges following CTCC or RF diathermy capsulotomy. The lens contents were removed by phacoemulsification to permit the implantation of probes that exerted a test force on the capsulotomy edge and were moved in diametrically opposite directions using computer-controlled stepping motors. The magnitude of the force was measured during the capsule stretch, which allowed precise determination of the degree of capsular distention at the time of capsular rupture. Selected capsular edges were subsequently examined by scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS: The capsulotomy edge produced by CTCC was significantly stronger (P < .001) than that following RF. The mean (+/-SD) force to achieve capsule rupture was 0.15 +/- 0.06 N with CTCC compared with 0.02 +/- 0.01 N with RF. The mean (+/-SD) increase in the capsulotomy circumference was significantly greater with CTCC at 53% +/- 14.5% compared with RF at 18% +/- 8.5% (P < .001). Scanning electron microscopy disclosed a smooth edge for the CTCC capsulotomy. In contrast, multiple irregularities were seen in the edge following RF. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous-tear circular capsulorhexis provides a stronger capsulotomy and is the preferred method in routine cataract surgery. However, RF diathermy capsulotomy may have a useful role in conditions unfavorable to the safe completion of CTCC.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 58 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the biomechanical properties of the capsulotomy edge following continuous-tear circular capsulorhexis (CTCC) or radiofrequency (RF) diathermy capsulotomy. METHODS: A test apparatus was constructed that allowed controlled stretching of capsulotomy edges following CTCC or RF diathermy capsulotomy. The lens contents were removed by phacoemulsification to permit the implantation of probes that exerted a test force on the capsulotomy edge and were moved in diametrically opposite directions using computer-controlled stepping motors. The magnitude of the force was measured during the capsule stretch, which allowed precise determination of the degree of capsular distention at the time of capsular rupture. Selected capsular edges were subsequently examined by scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS: The capsulotomy edge produced by CTCC was significantly stronger (P < .001) than that following RF. The mean (+/-SD) force to achieve capsule rupture was 0.15 +/- 0.06 N with CTCC compared with 0.02 +/- 0.01 N with RF. The mean (+/-SD) increase in the capsulotomy circumference was significantly greater with CTCC at 53% +/- 14.5% compared with RF at 18% +/- 8.5% (P < .001). Scanning electron microscopy disclosed a smooth edge for the CTCC capsulotomy. In contrast, multiple irregularities were seen in the edge following RF. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous-tear circular capsulorhexis provides a stronger capsulotomy and is the preferred method in routine cataract surgery. However, RF diathermy capsulotomy may have a useful role in conditions unfavorable to the safe completion of CTCC.

Key concepts: Capsulorhexis, Capsulotomy, Phacoemulsification, Medicine, Capsule, Diathermy, Cataract surgery, Lens (geology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Mechanical Properties of the Human Lens Capsule Following Capsulorhexis or Radiofrequency Diathermy Capsulotomy — Research Paper | ScholarLens