1987•The Thoracic and Cardiovascular SurgeonRequires access

Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Cardiovascular Surgery

S Geroulanos, S. Oxelbark, B Donfried, Florian Recker, Matthias Turina

Open publisher page 19 citations

Abstract

In the past five years three prospective randomized studies compared five different prophylactic antimicrobial regimens in major cardiovascular surgery. In 1980/81 a 4 d cefazolin (CFZ) prophylaxis (16 X 0.5 g) was compared with a 2 d cefuroxime (CFX) administration (4 X 1.5 g). Of the 566 patients who entered the study 281 received CFZ and 285 were given CFX. In 1982/83 a 2 d CFX prophylaxis (4 X 1.5 g) was compared with a two shot ceftriaxone (CRO) prophylaxis (2 g i.v., + 1 g 24 h later). Of the 512 patients enrolled 258 received CFX and 254 CRO. In 1984/85 a 1 d CFZ prophylaxis (4 X 0.5 g) was compared with a single shot prophylaxis of CRO (1 X 2 g). Of the 541 patients who entered the study 272 received CFZ and 269 CRO. All patients of age 16 y or older who were undergoing open heart surgery (n = 1384) and surgery of the major arteries (n = 235) were eligible for trial entry with the following exceptions: patients with preoperative infections, those who had received an antibiotic within 48 h of operation, and any with known allergies to cephalosporins or who had suffered an anaphylactic reaction to any penicillin. The patients were allocated to one of the two treatments by means of a randomized code, stratified for cardiac and major vascular operations. The first dosis was always given prior to surgery at the beginning of anesthesia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In the past five years three prospective randomized studies compared five different prophylactic antimicrobial regimens in major cardiovascular surgery. In 1980/81 a 4 d cefazolin (CFZ) prophylaxis (16 X 0.5 g) was compared with a 2 d cefuroxime (CFX) administration (4 X 1.5 g). Of the 566 patients who entered the study 281 received CFZ and 285 were given CFX. In 1982/83 a 2 d CFX prophylaxis (4 X 1.5 g) was compared with a two shot ceftriaxone (CRO) prophylaxis (2 g i.v., + 1 g 24 h later). Of the 512 patients enrolled 258 received CFX and 254 CRO. In 1984/85 a 1 d CFZ prophylaxis (4 X 0.5 g) was compared with a single shot prophylaxis of CRO (1 X 2 g). Of the 541 patients who entered the study 272 received CFZ and 269 CRO. All patients of age 16 y or older who were undergoing open heart surgery (n = 1384) and surgery of the major arteries (n = 235) were eligible for trial entry with the following exceptions: patients with preoperative infections, those who had received an antibiotic within 48 h of operation, and any with known allergies to cephalosporins or who had suffered an anaphylactic reaction to any penicillin. The patients were allocated to one of the two treatments by means of a randomized code, stratified for cardiac and major vascular operations. The first dosis was always given prior to surgery at the beginning of anesthesia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In the past five years three prospective randomized studies compared five different prophylactic antimicrobial regimens in major cardiovascular surgery. In 1980/81 a 4 d cefazolin (CFZ) prophylaxis (16 X 0.5 g) was compared with a 2 d cefuroxime (CFX) administration (4 X 1.5 g). Of the 566 patients who entered the study 281 received CFZ and 285 were given CFX. In 1982/83 a 2 d CFX prophylaxis (4 X 1.5 g) was compared with a two shot ceftriaxone (CRO) prophylaxis (2 g i.v., + 1 g 24 h later). Of the 512 patients enrolled 258 received CFX and 254 CRO. In 1984/85 a 1 d CFZ prophylaxis (4 X 0.5 g) was compared with a single shot prophylaxis of CRO (1 X 2 g). Of the 541 patients who entered the study 272 received CFZ and 269 CRO. All patients of age 16 y or older who were undergoing open heart surgery (n = 1384) and surgery of the major arteries (n = 235) were eligible for trial entry with the following exceptions: patients with preoperative infections, those who had received an antibiotic within 48 h of operation, and any with known allergies to cephalosporins or who had suffered an anaphylactic reaction to any penicillin. The patients were allocated to one of the two treatments by means of a randomized code, stratified for cardiac and major vascular operations. The first dosis was always given prior to surgery at the beginning of anesthesia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Key concepts: Medicine, Cefazolin, Cefuroxime, Antibiotic prophylaxis, Ceftriaxone, Premedication, Cephalosporin, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Cardiovascular Surgery — Research Paper | ScholarLens