1998Journal of Cataract & Refractive SurgeryRequires access

Laser in situ keratomileusis after photorefractive keratectomy for myopic regression

Akif Özdamar, Bozkurt Şener, Cengiz Aras, R Aktunç

Open publisher page 22 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and safety of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for regression after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). SETTING: Eye Research Center, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey. METHODS: Laser in situ keratomileusis to treat residual myopia ranging from 1.50 to 12.50 diopters (D) (mean 5.96 D +/- 3.06 [SD]) was performed in 45 eyes of 25 patients. Cylindrical corrections were done in 7 eyes (15.6%) and spherical ablations, in 38 (84.4%). The mean interval between primary PRK and LASIK retreatment was 18.50 +/- 8.12 months. The procedure was performed under a hinged corneal flap using the Chiron Automated Corneal Shaper and Chiron Keracor 116 excimer laser. RESULTS: Six months after LASIK retreatment, mean spherical equivalent refraction was -0.67 +/- 0.77 D. Thirty-six eyes (80%) were within +/- 1.00 D of emmetropia. Uncorrected visual acuity was 20/40 or more in 31 eyes (68.9%); 2 eyes (4%) lost 2 lines of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity. There was no statistically significant difference in corneal haze before and after LASIK. CONCLUSION: Laser in situ keratomileusis was safe and effective for treating residual myopia after excimer laser PRK.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and safety of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for regression after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). SETTING: Eye Research Center, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey. METHODS: Laser in situ keratomileusis to treat residual myopia ranging from 1.50 to 12.50 diopters (D) (mean 5.96 D +/- 3.06 [SD]) was performed in 45 eyes of 25 patients. Cylindrical corrections were done in 7 eyes (15.6%) and spherical ablations, in 38 (84.4%). The mean interval between primary PRK and LASIK retreatment was 18.50 +/- 8.12 months. The procedure was performed under a hinged corneal flap using the Chiron Automated Corneal Shaper and Chiron Keracor 116 excimer laser. RESULTS: Six months after LASIK retreatment, mean spherical equivalent refraction was -0.67 +/- 0.77 D. Thirty-six eyes (80%) were within +/- 1.00 D of emmetropia. Uncorrected visual acuity was 20/40 or more in 31 eyes (68.9%); 2 eyes (4%) lost 2 lines of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity. There was no statistically significant difference in corneal haze before and after LASIK. CONCLUSION: Laser in situ keratomileusis was safe and effective for treating residual myopia after excimer laser PRK.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 22 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and safety of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for regression after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). SETTING: Eye Research Center, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey. METHODS: Laser in situ keratomileusis to treat residual myopia ranging from 1.50 to 12.50 diopters (D) (mean 5.96 D +/- 3.06 [SD]) was performed in 45 eyes of 25 patients. Cylindrical corrections were done in 7 eyes (15.6%) and spherical ablations, in 38 (84.4%). The mean interval between primary PRK and LASIK retreatment was 18.50 +/- 8.12 months. The procedure was performed under a hinged corneal flap using the Chiron Automated Corneal Shaper and Chiron Keracor 116 excimer laser. RESULTS: Six months after LASIK retreatment, mean spherical equivalent refraction was -0.67 +/- 0.77 D. Thirty-six eyes (80%) were within +/- 1.00 D of emmetropia. Uncorrected visual acuity was 20/40 or more in 31 eyes (68.9%); 2 eyes (4%) lost 2 lines of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity. There was no statistically significant difference in corneal haze before and after LASIK. CONCLUSION: Laser in situ keratomileusis was safe and effective for treating residual myopia after excimer laser PRK.

Key concepts: Keratomileusis, Photorefractive keratectomy, LASIK, Emmetropia, Medicine, Dioptre, Ophthalmology, Refractive error

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Laser in situ keratomileusis after photorefractive keratectomy for myopic regression — Research Paper | ScholarLens