1994Pediatric AnesthesiaRequires access

Recovery times following induction of anaesthesia with propofol, methohexitone, enflurane or thiopentone in children

A. Sharples, E.A. Shaw, G. MEAKIN

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

Summary We have measured the times to early recovery in forty children aged 3‐14 years in whom anaesthesia was induced by intravenous propofol, methohexitone, thiopentone or inhalation of enflurane. Maintenance anaesthesia consisted of inhalation of nitrous oxide, oxygen and enflurane via a face mask. Early recovery, assessed by the Steward recovery score, was significantly faster after propofol, methohexitone or inhalation of enflurane compared with thiopentone (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in recovery times between propofol, methohexitone or enflurane. We conclude that the use of propofol to induce anaesthesia does not hasten recovery in children undergoing short day‐case procedures compared with methohexitone or inhalation of enflurane.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Summary We have measured the times to early recovery in forty children aged 3‐14 years in whom anaesthesia was induced by intravenous propofol, methohexitone, thiopentone or inhalation of enflurane. Maintenance anaesthesia consisted of inhalation of nitrous oxide, oxygen and enflurane via a face mask. Early recovery, assessed by the Steward recovery score, was significantly faster after propofol, methohexitone or inhalation of enflurane compared with thiopentone (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in recovery times between propofol, methohexitone or enflurane. We conclude that the use of propofol to induce anaesthesia does not hasten recovery in children undergoing short day‐case procedures compared with methohexitone or inhalation of enflurane.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Summary We have measured the times to early recovery in forty children aged 3‐14 years in whom anaesthesia was induced by intravenous propofol, methohexitone, thiopentone or inhalation of enflurane. Maintenance anaesthesia consisted of inhalation of nitrous oxide, oxygen and enflurane via a face mask. Early recovery, assessed by the Steward recovery score, was significantly faster after propofol, methohexitone or inhalation of enflurane compared with thiopentone (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in recovery times between propofol, methohexitone or enflurane. We conclude that the use of propofol to induce anaesthesia does not hasten recovery in children undergoing short day‐case procedures compared with methohexitone or inhalation of enflurane.

Key concepts: Enflurane, Propofol, Medicine, Anesthesia, Inhalation, Methohexital, Nitrous oxide, Halothane

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Recovery times following induction of anaesthesia with propofol, methohexitone, enflurane or thiopentone in children — Research Paper | ScholarLens