2005Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIERequires access

Detecting focus-sensitive configurations during OPC

Lawrence S. Melvin, James P. Shiely, Qiliang Yan

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Model-based optical proximity correction (OPC) calculates pattern adjustments by simulating the layout with calibrated lithography and process models. OPC can only correct systematic lithography deviations, those error components that repeat chip to chip. OPC cannot compensate random deviation error components from unpredictable process variations, such as defocus and dose. However the ranges of variation from random effects is predictable, and OPC can optimize correction shapes to minimize this range where possible. Current techniques for supporting this optimization involve applying a set of models covering the range of expected process variations in defocus and exposure. Variation is assessed by comparing process corner-point model evaluations. Because there is a significant runtime cost simulating multiple process conditions, most production OPC jobs use a single, representative model (typically the "nominal" process condition) aided with rules and other heuristics to help handle process window effects. In this paper the application of a new type of model that can be used to predict process variation with a single simulation call. The model involved in these studies targets pattern behavior as the focus offset deviates from the nominal focus setting. Used in conjunction with a nominal process model, this model can support process-window optimized OPC without the need for multiple models at various defocus settings. This model can also be used by itself to assess the defocus robustness of any configuration before or after OPC, thereby supporting efficient model-based layout verification.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Model-based optical proximity correction (OPC) calculates pattern adjustments by simulating the layout with calibrated lithography and process models. OPC can only correct systematic lithography deviations, those error components that repeat chip to chip. OPC cannot compensate random deviation error components from unpredictable process variations, such as defocus and dose. However the ranges of variation from random effects is predictable, and OPC can optimize correction shapes to minimize this range where possible. Current techniques for supporting this optimization involve applying a set of models covering the range of expected process variations in defocus and exposure. Variation is assessed by comparing process corner-point model evaluations. Because there is a significant runtime cost simulating multiple process conditions, most production OPC jobs use a single, representative model (typically the "nominal" process condition) aided with rules and other heuristics to help handle process window effects. In this paper the application of a new type of model that can be used to predict process variation with a single simulation call. The model involved in these studies targets pattern behavior as the focus offset deviates from the nominal focus setting. Used in conjunction with a nominal process model, this model can support process-window optimized OPC without the need for multiple models at various defocus settings. This model can also be used by itself to assess the defocus robustness of any configuration before or after OPC, thereby supporting efficient model-based layout verification.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Model-based optical proximity correction (OPC) calculates pattern adjustments by simulating the layout with calibrated lithography and process models. OPC can only correct systematic lithography deviations, those error components that repeat chip to chip. OPC cannot compensate random deviation error components from unpredictable process variations, such as defocus and dose. However the ranges of variation from random effects is predictable, and OPC can optimize correction shapes to minimize this range where possible. Current techniques for supporting this optimization involve applying a set of models covering the range of expected process variations in defocus and exposure. Variation is assessed by comparing process corner-point model evaluations. Because there is a significant runtime cost simulating multiple process conditions, most production OPC jobs use a single, representative model (typically the "nominal" process condition) aided with rules and other heuristics to help handle process window effects. In this paper the application of a new type of model that can be used to predict process variation with a single simulation call. The model involved in these studies targets pattern behavior as the focus offset deviates from the nominal focus setting. Used in conjunction with a nominal process model, this model can support process-window optimized OPC without the need for multiple models at various defocus settings. This model can also be used by itself to assess the defocus robustness of any configuration before or after OPC, thereby supporting efficient model-based layout verification.

Key concepts: Optical proximity correction, Process window, Process variation, Computer science, Offset (computer science), Robustness (evolution), Heuristics, Focus (optics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Detecting focus-sensitive configurations during OPC — Research Paper | ScholarLens