Leadership Development as a Systematic and Multidisciplinary Enterprise
Stacey L. Connaughton, Francis L. Lawrence, Brent D. Ruben
Abstract
Stacey L. Connaughton, Francis L. Lawrence, Brent D. Ruben
Abstract
Leadership development is a fundamental responsibility of colleges and universities. In this article, the authors present the theoretical foundation of an innovative initiative, as well as criteria for assessing leadership development programs in higher education. They use the Student Leadership Development Institute at Rutgers University as a case study for demonstrating that leadership development initiatives should be systematic, multidisciplinary, and research oriented and have several experiential components.
OpenAlex reports 81 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Leadership development is a fundamental responsibility of colleges and universities. In this article, the authors present the theoretical foundation of an innovative initiative, as well as criteria for assessing leadership development programs in higher education. They use the Student Leadership Development Institute at Rutgers University as a case study for demonstrating that leadership development initiatives should be systematic, multidisciplinary, and research oriented and have several experiential components.
Key concepts: Leadership development, Multidisciplinary approach, Neuroleadership, Engineering ethics, Leadership studies, Experiential learning, Foundation (evidence), Educational leadership