1990Psychological AssessmentRequires access

WAIS—R validation of the Wonderlic Personnel Test as a brief intelligence measure in a psychiatric sample.

Keith A. Hawkins, Stephen V. Faraone, John Pepple, Larry J. Seidman, Ming T. Tsuang

Open publisher page 43 citations

Abstract

Although there have been several reports of high correlations between Wonderlic Personnel Test scores and Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) Full Scale IQ, findings have been inconsistent in psychiatric samples. Sample differences and differences between the WAIS and the revised WAIS (WAIS-R) were considered likely reasons. In this study of relatively nonagitated but chronically ill psychiatric patients (N = 18), Wonderlic IQ estimation accuracy and Wonderlic/WAIS-R correlations were consistent with data previously reported for the WAIS, and generally support the value of the Wonderlic as a highly economical measure of general intelligence. However, the inability of 1 subject to manage the Wonderlic format suggests that severe visuospatial impairment can invalidate this test

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Although there have been several reports of high correlations between Wonderlic Personnel Test scores and Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) Full Scale IQ, findings have been inconsistent in psychiatric samples. Sample differences and differences between the WAIS and the revised WAIS (WAIS-R) were considered likely reasons. In this study of relatively nonagitated but chronically ill psychiatric patients (N = 18), Wonderlic IQ estimation accuracy and Wonderlic/WAIS-R correlations were consistent with data previously reported for the WAIS, and generally support the value of the Wonderlic as a highly economical measure of general intelligence. However, the inability of 1 subject to manage the Wonderlic format suggests that severe visuospatial impairment can invalidate this test

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 43 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Although there have been several reports of high correlations between Wonderlic Personnel Test scores and Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) Full Scale IQ, findings have been inconsistent in psychiatric samples. Sample differences and differences between the WAIS and the revised WAIS (WAIS-R) were considered likely reasons. In this study of relatively nonagitated but chronically ill psychiatric patients (N = 18), Wonderlic IQ estimation accuracy and Wonderlic/WAIS-R correlations were consistent with data previously reported for the WAIS, and generally support the value of the Wonderlic as a highly economical measure of general intelligence. However, the inability of 1 subject to manage the Wonderlic format suggests that severe visuospatial impairment can invalidate this test

Key concepts: Psychology, Test validity, Psychometrics, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, Validation test, Clinical psychology, Test (biology), Measure (data warehouse)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
WAIS—R validation of the Wonderlic Personnel Test as a brief intelligence measure in a psychiatric sample. — Research Paper | ScholarLens