A comparison of the thermodilution and impedance cardiography methods in the measurement of cardiac output
Constantinos S. Pattichis, L. E. Baker
Abstract
Constantinos S. Pattichis, L. E. Baker
Abstract
A total of 126 cardiac output values were recorded by the thermodilution and impedance cardiography methods in 8 adult mongrel dogs. The mean cardiac output in Litres/min, standard deviation and standard error of the mean percent (SEM%) of the thermodilution and impedance methods were 1.75, ± 0.92, 4.7% and 1.5, ± 0.59 and 3.5% respectively. Results show that the mean values of cardiac output measured by thermodilution and the impedance methods are the same (T test, Not significant at p<0.05). The reproducibility of the thermodilution method is poorer than that of the impedance method, as it is given by the SEM%. The correlation coefficients found for cardiac output and stroke volume were 0.61 and 0.76 respectively. The results of this study encourage the use of the impedance method in cases of low cardiac output
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A total of 126 cardiac output values were recorded by the thermodilution and impedance cardiography methods in 8 adult mongrel dogs. The mean cardiac output in Litres/min, standard deviation and standard error of the mean percent (SEM%) of the thermodilution and impedance methods were 1.75, ± 0.92, 4.7% and 1.5, ± 0.59 and 3.5% respectively. Results show that the mean values of cardiac output measured by thermodilution and the impedance methods are the same (T test, Not significant at p<0.05). The reproducibility of the thermodilution method is poorer than that of the impedance method, as it is given by the SEM%. The correlation coefficients found for cardiac output and stroke volume were 0.61 and 0.76 respectively. The results of this study encourage the use of the impedance method in cases of low cardiac output
Key concepts: Impedance cardiography, Cardiac output, Reproducibility, Stroke volume, Standard deviation, Electrical impedance, Medicine, Cardiology