1988HybridomaRequires access

Direct Comparison of Electric Field-Mediated and PEG-Mediated Cell Fusion for the Generation of Antibody Producing Hybridomas

Uwe Karsten, P. Stolley, I. Walther, G Papsdorf, Stefan A. L. Weber, Karsten Conrad, L Pasternak, Janine Kopp

Open publisher page 43 citations

Abstract

As an alternative to polyethylene glycol (PEG), electric field pulses offer, in theory, fusion conditions whose parameters are better controllable. In 1985 (1) we reported on the successful generation of hybridoma clones by means of electrofusion performed in a batch-type manner similar to that usually employed with PEG, and applicable to any type of antigens. Here we summarize the results of a series of fusions performed since then in which both electric field and PEG induced fusion were directly compared. Different types of antigens were used. Electrofusion resulted in a 3.8 to 33.0 times higher yield of hybridomas per unit number of spleen cells. Moreover, hybridomas grew more vigorously after fusion and, therefore, were earlier visible. Other parameters examined revealed no differences between hybridomas generated by either method.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

As an alternative to polyethylene glycol (PEG), electric field pulses offer, in theory, fusion conditions whose parameters are better controllable. In 1985 (1) we reported on the successful generation of hybridoma clones by means of electrofusion performed in a batch-type manner similar to that usually employed with PEG, and applicable to any type of antigens. Here we summarize the results of a series of fusions performed since then in which both electric field and PEG induced fusion were directly compared. Different types of antigens were used. Electrofusion resulted in a 3.8 to 33.0 times higher yield of hybridomas per unit number of spleen cells. Moreover, hybridomas grew more vigorously after fusion and, therefore, were earlier visible. Other parameters examined revealed no differences between hybridomas generated by either method.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 43 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

As an alternative to polyethylene glycol (PEG), electric field pulses offer, in theory, fusion conditions whose parameters are better controllable. In 1985 (1) we reported on the successful generation of hybridoma clones by means of electrofusion performed in a batch-type manner similar to that usually employed with PEG, and applicable to any type of antigens. Here we summarize the results of a series of fusions performed since then in which both electric field and PEG induced fusion were directly compared. Different types of antigens were used. Electrofusion resulted in a 3.8 to 33.0 times higher yield of hybridomas per unit number of spleen cells. Moreover, hybridomas grew more vigorously after fusion and, therefore, were earlier visible. Other parameters examined revealed no differences between hybridomas generated by either method.

Key concepts: Electrofusion, PEG ratio, Polyethylene glycol, Cell fusion, Fusion, Monoclonal antibody, Electric field, Antigen

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Direct Comparison of Electric Field-Mediated and PEG-Mediated Cell Fusion for the Generation of Antibody Producing Hybridomas — Research Paper | ScholarLens