The Word for 'One' in Proto-Semitic
Aren M. Wilson-Wright
Abstract
Aren M. Wilson-Wright
Abstract
Traditionally, scholars have reconstructed *waḥad or some variant thereof as the word for ‘one’ in Proto-Semitic. In this paper, I argue that *'ast- is a better candidate because it is attested as a number in both East and West Semitic. *waḥad, by contrast, was most likely an adjective meaning ‘lone’ as in Akkadian. Along the way, I will review some methodological criteria that may prove useful in the ongoing effort to reconstruct Proto-Semitic.
OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Traditionally, scholars have reconstructed *waḥad or some variant thereof as the word for ‘one’ in Proto-Semitic. In this paper, I argue that *'ast- is a better candidate because it is attested as a number in both East and West Semitic. *waḥad, by contrast, was most likely an adjective meaning ‘lone’ as in Akkadian. Along the way, I will review some methodological criteria that may prove useful in the ongoing effort to reconstruct Proto-Semitic.
Key concepts: Semitic languages, Akkadian, Adjective, Linguistics, Word (group theory), Meaning (existential), History, Contrast (vision)