Waw sargonicum. On Parataxis in Sargonic Royal Inscriptions
Leonid E. Kogan
Abstract
Leonid E. Kogan
Abstract
According to a widespread belief, the prepositive connective conjunction *wa- , a highly prominent Common Semitic syntactic feature, is generally lost in Akkadian, where it is replaced by the postpositive -ma . The article investigates the paratactic structures of the earliest syntactically informative documents written in Akkadian, the Sargonic royal inscriptions, in an attempt to show that the role of the connective u in this corpus is radically different from what we find in its later analogues. This fact may have some implications for the diachronic background of the connective element /u/ in Sumerian. As for the history of the Akkadian parataxis as a whole, interesting structural parallels to it are found on the opposite extreme of the Semitic-speaking world, in the modern Semitic languages of Ethiopia.
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
According to a widespread belief, the prepositive connective conjunction *wa- , a highly prominent Common Semitic syntactic feature, is generally lost in Akkadian, where it is replaced by the postpositive -ma . The article investigates the paratactic structures of the earliest syntactically informative documents written in Akkadian, the Sargonic royal inscriptions, in an attempt to show that the role of the connective u in this corpus is radically different from what we find in its later analogues. This fact may have some implications for the diachronic background of the connective element /u/ in Sumerian. As for the history of the Akkadian parataxis as a whole, interesting structural parallels to it are found on the opposite extreme of the Semitic-speaking world, in the modern Semitic languages of Ethiopia.
Key concepts: Akkadian, Semitic languages, Sumerian, History, Linguistics, Parallels, Literature, Philosophy