1991Journal of Hydraulic EngineeringRequires access

Riprap Design for Overtopping Flow

Steven R. Abt, Terry L. Johnson

Open publisher page 75 citations

Abstract

Near‐prototype flume studies were conducted in which riprap‐protected embankments were subjected to overtopping flows. Embankment slopes of 1, 2, 8, 10, and 20% were covered with riprap layers with median stone sizes of 1, 2, 4, 5, and/or 6 in. Each riprap layer was tested by slowly increasing the discharge to failure. Riprap design criteria for overtopping flows were developed for estimating incipient stone movement and riprap layer failure as a function of the unit discharge, stone shape, median stone size, and embankment slope. Incipient stone movement occurred at approximately 74% of the riprap layer failure unit discharge. It was determined that rounded shape stone should be oversized approximately 40% to provide comparable protection of an angular shape stone. Flow channelization was observed to occur at approximately 88% of the unit discharge at failure. A flow concentration factor of approximately 1 to 3 was introduced for sizing stone.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Near‐prototype flume studies were conducted in which riprap‐protected embankments were subjected to overtopping flows. Embankment slopes of 1, 2, 8, 10, and 20% were covered with riprap layers with median stone sizes of 1, 2, 4, 5, and/or 6 in. Each riprap layer was tested by slowly increasing the discharge to failure. Riprap design criteria for overtopping flows were developed for estimating incipient stone movement and riprap layer failure as a function of the unit discharge, stone shape, median stone size, and embankment slope. Incipient stone movement occurred at approximately 74% of the riprap layer failure unit discharge. It was determined that rounded shape stone should be oversized approximately 40% to provide comparable protection of an angular shape stone. Flow channelization was observed to occur at approximately 88% of the unit discharge at failure. A flow concentration factor of approximately 1 to 3 was introduced for sizing stone.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 75 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Near‐prototype flume studies were conducted in which riprap‐protected embankments were subjected to overtopping flows. Embankment slopes of 1, 2, 8, 10, and 20% were covered with riprap layers with median stone sizes of 1, 2, 4, 5, and/or 6 in. Each riprap layer was tested by slowly increasing the discharge to failure. Riprap design criteria for overtopping flows were developed for estimating incipient stone movement and riprap layer failure as a function of the unit discharge, stone shape, median stone size, and embankment slope. Incipient stone movement occurred at approximately 74% of the riprap layer failure unit discharge. It was determined that rounded shape stone should be oversized approximately 40% to provide comparable protection of an angular shape stone. Flow channelization was observed to occur at approximately 88% of the unit discharge at failure. A flow concentration factor of approximately 1 to 3 was introduced for sizing stone.

Key concepts: Riprap, Flume, Geotechnical engineering, Geology, Levee, Flow (mathematics), Crushed stone, Flow conditions

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Riprap Design for Overtopping Flow — Research Paper | ScholarLens