1980Antimicrobial Agents and ChemotherapyOpen access

Comparison of cefoperazone, cefotaxime, and moxalactam (LY127935) against aerobic gram-negative bacilli

S. D. R. Lang, Denzel Edwards, David T. Durack

Open full text 66 citations

Abstract

This study compares the minimum inhibitory concentrations of cefoperazone, cefotaxime, and moxalactam (LY127935) for 446 aerobic gram-negative bacillary isolates and further compares the minimum inhibitory concentrations of LY127935 and these third-generation cephalosporins with those of thienamycin for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Each antibiotic at low concentrations inhibited nearly all Enterobacteriaceae tested. Minimum inhibitory concentrations for P. aeruginosa were higher, but for a majority of strains they fell below achievable serum levels. Thienamycin and cefoperazone showed significantly greater antipseudomonal activity than did cefotaxime or LY127935. Cefoxitin-inducible resistance to LY127935 and the two cephalosporins was demonstrated among Enterobacter species but did not occur with thienamycin.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study compares the minimum inhibitory concentrations of cefoperazone, cefotaxime, and moxalactam (LY127935) for 446 aerobic gram-negative bacillary isolates and further compares the minimum inhibitory concentrations of LY127935 and these third-generation cephalosporins with those of thienamycin for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Each antibiotic at low concentrations inhibited nearly all Enterobacteriaceae tested. Minimum inhibitory concentrations for P. aeruginosa were higher, but for a majority of strains they fell below achievable serum levels. Thienamycin and cefoperazone showed significantly greater antipseudomonal activity than did cefotaxime or LY127935. Cefoxitin-inducible resistance to LY127935 and the two cephalosporins was demonstrated among Enterobacter species but did not occur with thienamycin.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 66 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study compares the minimum inhibitory concentrations of cefoperazone, cefotaxime, and moxalactam (LY127935) for 446 aerobic gram-negative bacillary isolates and further compares the minimum inhibitory concentrations of LY127935 and these third-generation cephalosporins with those of thienamycin for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Each antibiotic at low concentrations inhibited nearly all Enterobacteriaceae tested. Minimum inhibitory concentrations for P. aeruginosa were higher, but for a majority of strains they fell below achievable serum levels. Thienamycin and cefoperazone showed significantly greater antipseudomonal activity than did cefotaxime or LY127935. Cefoxitin-inducible resistance to LY127935 and the two cephalosporins was demonstrated among Enterobacter species but did not occur with thienamycin.

Key concepts: Cefoperazone, Moxalactam, Cefotaxime, Thienamycin, Cefoxitin, Cephalosporin, Microbiology, Minimum inhibitory concentration

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of cefoperazone, cefotaxime, and moxalactam (LY127935) against aerobic gram-negative bacilli — Research Paper | ScholarLens