1981Microbiology and ImmunologyOpen access

Comparative Activity of N‐Formimidoyl Thienamycin with Third Generation Cephalosporins and Ureido Penicillins against Multiple Resistant Serratia marcescens

Marcia A. Miller, Jack L. LeFrock, Mary J. Vercler

Open full text 5 citations

Abstract

Twenty multiple resistant clinical isolates were tested with N-formimidoyl thienamycin, moxalactam, cefotaxime, cefoperazone, and the three ureidopenicillins: azlocillin, mezlocillin, and piperacillin. A concentration of less than 0.97 microgram/ml inhibited 100% of organisms for N-f-thienamycin and cefotaxime, 90% for moxalactam, and 60% for cefoperazone. An increase in inoculum from 10(3) to 10(6) cells reduced activity fourfold for 95% of isolates with cefoperazone, 70% with N-formimidoyl thienamycin, 65% for cefotaxime, but only 15% for moxalactam. For ureidopenicillins, 85% of strains tested had MIC's less than or equal to 15.6 micrograms/ml. An inoculum effect was observed in only 35-50%. At 10(3), the cidal concentration was the same or twofold greater than the inhibitory level for N-f-thienamycin and cephalosporins in 70% of strains tested and 65% for penicillins. With 10(6), the 70% value remained for N-f-thienamycin but was reduced to 45% for cefotaxime and 25% for moxalactam; 85% demonstrated greater than eightfold differences with cefoperazone. Single step high-level resistance was observed to moxalactam (20%). Carbenicillin resistant strains were cross-resistant to the ureidopenicillins. N-f-thienamycin and cefotaxime appeared comparable, although important differences between morphological alteration and metabolism may influence their therapeutic effectiveness.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Twenty multiple resistant clinical isolates were tested with N-formimidoyl thienamycin, moxalactam, cefotaxime, cefoperazone, and the three ureidopenicillins: azlocillin, mezlocillin, and piperacillin. A concentration of less than 0.97 microgram/ml inhibited 100% of organisms for N-f-thienamycin and cefotaxime, 90% for moxalactam, and 60% for cefoperazone. An increase in inoculum from 10(3) to 10(6) cells reduced activity fourfold for 95% of isolates with cefoperazone, 70% with N-formimidoyl thienamycin, 65% for cefotaxime, but only 15% for moxalactam. For ureidopenicillins, 85% of strains tested had MIC's less than or equal to 15.6 micrograms/ml. An inoculum effect was observed in only 35-50%. At 10(3), the cidal concentration was the same or twofold greater than the inhibitory level for N-f-thienamycin and cephalosporins in 70% of strains tested and 65% for penicillins. With 10(6), the 70% value remained for N-f-thienamycin but was reduced to 45% for cefotaxime and 25% for moxalactam; 85% demonstrated greater than eightfold differences with cefoperazone. Single step high-level resistance was observed to moxalactam (20%). Carbenicillin resistant strains were cross-resistant to the ureidopenicillins. N-f-thienamycin and cefotaxime appeared comparable, although important differences between morphological alteration and metabolism may influence their therapeutic effectiveness.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Twenty multiple resistant clinical isolates were tested with N-formimidoyl thienamycin, moxalactam, cefotaxime, cefoperazone, and the three ureidopenicillins: azlocillin, mezlocillin, and piperacillin. A concentration of less than 0.97 microgram/ml inhibited 100% of organisms for N-f-thienamycin and cefotaxime, 90% for moxalactam, and 60% for cefoperazone. An increase in inoculum from 10(3) to 10(6) cells reduced activity fourfold for 95% of isolates with cefoperazone, 70% with N-formimidoyl thienamycin, 65% for cefotaxime, but only 15% for moxalactam. For ureidopenicillins, 85% of strains tested had MIC's less than or equal to 15.6 micrograms/ml. An inoculum effect was observed in only 35-50%. At 10(3), the cidal concentration was the same or twofold greater than the inhibitory level for N-f-thienamycin and cephalosporins in 70% of strains tested and 65% for penicillins. With 10(6), the 70% value remained for N-f-thienamycin but was reduced to 45% for cefotaxime and 25% for moxalactam; 85% demonstrated greater than eightfold differences with cefoperazone. Single step high-level resistance was observed to moxalactam (20%). Carbenicillin resistant strains were cross-resistant to the ureidopenicillins. N-f-thienamycin and cefotaxime appeared comparable, although important differences between morphological alteration and metabolism may influence their therapeutic effectiveness.

Key concepts: Thienamycin, Moxalactam, Cefoperazone, Cefotaxime, Microbiology, Azlocillin, Cephalosporin, Latamoxef

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative Activity of N‐Formimidoyl Thienamycin with Third Generation Cephalosporins and Ureido Penicillins against Multiple Resistant Serratia marcescens — Research Paper | ScholarLens