1975Crop ScienceRequires access

Partial Reversal of Temperature‐dependent Inhibition of Soybean Hypocotyl Elongation by Cotyledon Excision1

J. S. Burris, K. H. Knittle

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

The effect of removal of cotyledonary tissue on the subsequent hypocotyl elongation at 25 C of four soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) cultivars was studied. Following a 24‐hour imbibltion period, cotyledonary tissue was removed from seed of “short” hypocotyl ‘Amsoy’ and ‘Beeson’ and “long” hypocotyl ‘Corsoy’ and ‘Hawkeye.’ Seed were then grown on paper towels for 7 days at 25 or 31 C. Inhibition of Amsoy and Beeson hypocotyl elongation at 25 C was reduced by this technique. Hypocotyl dry weight decreased, but hypocotyl length increased with increasing percentage removal of cotyledons. Removal of 50% gave the greatest reversal of the inhibition; at 75% removal, limited food reserves apparently decreased hypocotyl length. Hawkeye and Corsoy hypocotyl length did not increase with increasing cotyledon removal. Resuits suggested that inhibition of Amsoy and Beeson hypocotyl elongation at 25 C may be due to an inhibitory substance, or its precursor, located in the cotyledons.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The effect of removal of cotyledonary tissue on the subsequent hypocotyl elongation at 25 C of four soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) cultivars was studied. Following a 24‐hour imbibltion period, cotyledonary tissue was removed from seed of “short” hypocotyl ‘Amsoy’ and ‘Beeson’ and “long” hypocotyl ‘Corsoy’ and ‘Hawkeye.’ Seed were then grown on paper towels for 7 days at 25 or 31 C. Inhibition of Amsoy and Beeson hypocotyl elongation at 25 C was reduced by this technique. Hypocotyl dry weight decreased, but hypocotyl length increased with increasing percentage removal of cotyledons. Removal of 50% gave the greatest reversal of the inhibition; at 75% removal, limited food reserves apparently decreased hypocotyl length. Hawkeye and Corsoy hypocotyl length did not increase with increasing cotyledon removal. Resuits suggested that inhibition of Amsoy and Beeson hypocotyl elongation at 25 C may be due to an inhibitory substance, or its precursor, located in the cotyledons.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The effect of removal of cotyledonary tissue on the subsequent hypocotyl elongation at 25 C of four soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) cultivars was studied. Following a 24‐hour imbibltion period, cotyledonary tissue was removed from seed of “short” hypocotyl ‘Amsoy’ and ‘Beeson’ and “long” hypocotyl ‘Corsoy’ and ‘Hawkeye.’ Seed were then grown on paper towels for 7 days at 25 or 31 C. Inhibition of Amsoy and Beeson hypocotyl elongation at 25 C was reduced by this technique. Hypocotyl dry weight decreased, but hypocotyl length increased with increasing percentage removal of cotyledons. Removal of 50% gave the greatest reversal of the inhibition; at 75% removal, limited food reserves apparently decreased hypocotyl length. Hawkeye and Corsoy hypocotyl length did not increase with increasing cotyledon removal. Resuits suggested that inhibition of Amsoy and Beeson hypocotyl elongation at 25 C may be due to an inhibitory substance, or its precursor, located in the cotyledons.

Key concepts: Hypocotyl, Cotyledon, Elongation, Biology, Botany, Horticulture, Materials science, Ultimate tensile strength

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Partial Reversal of Temperature‐dependent Inhibition of Soybean Hypocotyl Elongation by Cotyledon Excision1 — Research Paper | ScholarLens